Previously, trying to view files that were annexed, but missing, just
led to an uninformative error 500. This was rather confusing.
With these changes it now shows the pointer target instead of the
(missing) content of the file, and also indicates this situation in the
"stored with git-annex" message. For semantic correctness views for
missing files return a 404 instead of a 200, as they would with the
content present.
Fixes#7, fixes#13.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/matrss/forgejo-aneksajo/pulls/28
Co-authored-by: Matthias Riße <m.risse@fz-juelich.de>
Co-committed-by: Matthias Riße <m.risse@fz-juelich.de>
This updates the repo index/file view endpoints so annex files match the way
LFS files are rendered, making annexed files accessible via the web instead of
being black boxes only accessible by git clone.
This mostly just duplicates the existing LFS logic. It doesn't try to combine itself
with the existing logic, to make merging with upstream easier. If upstream ever
decides to accept, I would like to try to merge the redundant logic.
The one bit that doesn't directly copy LFS is my choice to hide annex-symlinks.
LFS files are always _pointer files_ and therefore always render with the "file"
icon and no special label, but annex files come in two flavours: symlinks or
pointer files. I've conflated both kinds to try to give a consistent experience.
The tests in here ensure the correct download link (/media, from the last PR)
renders in both the toolbar and, if a binary file (like most annexed files will be),
in the main pane, but it also adds quite a bit of code to make sure text files
that happen to be annexed are dug out and rendered inline like LFS files are.
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8112Fixes#6983.
I suppose a change like this doesn't require any testing?
## Checklist
The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org).
### Tests
- I added test coverage for Go changes...
- [ ] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests.
- [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server.
- I added test coverage for JavaScript changes...
- [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested.
- [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)).
### Documentation
- [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change.
- [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it.
### Release notes
- [x] I do not want this change to show in the release notes.
- [ ] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request.
- [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title.
Co-authored-by: Malte Jürgens <maltejur@dismail.de>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8120
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7640
Currently, if you have a mirrored repo, the button on the "branches"
page to create a new branch is available to be pressed. Once you name
your new branch and click submit, you get a 404 page that doesn't explain
what went wrong.
As new branch creation is not supported on mirrored repos, let's just
take that button away if the repo is a mirror. This is already done for
archived repos, so we just need to add another check.
Fixes#7639.
Co-authored-by: John Moon <john.moon@vts-i.com>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7869
Reviewed-by: Otto <otto@codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
On large screens, use grid to force right position of the button.
On small screens, just left it hang out wherever it fits. It's not possible to not make it hide behind mergebox while keeping `float`, and with grid it would overflow too much.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7746
Reviewed-by: Otto <otto@codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
(cherry picked from commit 0383e2e15a)
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7784
- Document that `is_system_webhook` field is accepted for the `POST /admin/hooks` endpoint.
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7786
Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7581
Followup to _many PRs_ where the old switches were converted to this one.
The main change here is to the switch with counter. It was missing a gap.
Additionally, it removes tailwind helpers the other switches retained from before switch refactors, because they are now using gap.
Co-authored-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7589
Reviewed-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7584
Followup to #6523
Reverts icon change introduced in #5695
It went unnoticed since v10 and was likely caused by bad copy paste and I don't think it's really worth a test.
Co-authored-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7585
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7421
- When migrating a pull requests from a Gitea or Forgejo instance, check if the pull request was created via the AGit flow and transfer that bit of information to the migrated pull request.
- Expose this bit of information as the `flow` field for the pull request.
- We have to do a horrible Go hack with Gitea's [go-sdk](gitea.com/gitea/go-sdk) to list all pull requests while being able to decode it to a struct that contains the new `Flow` field. The library does not allow you to do this out of the box, so we have to use `go:linkname` to access the private method that allows us to do this. This in turn means we have to do some boilerplate code that the library otherwise would do for us. The better option would be forking, but that would be a hassle of keeping the library in sync.
- Resolvesforgejo/forgejo#5848
- Unit test added.
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7437
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
**Backport of forgejo/forgejo#7422**
- Add new translations, if an existing one couldn't be used.
- Use existing translations, if one existed and fit the purpose.
- Spotted by the lint-locale-usage tooling by @fogti.
(cherry picked from commit bd9366e7fc)
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7430
Reviewed-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Co-committed-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7395
- Add `binding:"In(...)"` to the `default_merge_style` and `default_update_style` fields to only accept recognized merge and update styles.
- Resolvesforgejo/forgejo#7389
- Added integration test for the API (`binding` works in the exact same way for the API and web routes).
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7401
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
- This is a follow up on #7193 and resolves#6312.
- The ID by itself is not very useful, so also return the index of the workflow run.
Co-authored-by: Klaus Fyhn <klausfyhn@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Klaus Fyhn <klfj@mir-robots.com>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7286
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: klausfyhn <klausfyhn@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: klausfyhn <klausfyhn@noreply.codeberg.org>
- When the API endpoint `/repos/{owner}/{repo}/actions/workflows/{workflowname}/dispatches` is used to launch a workflow, it currently returns no data; `/repos/{owner}/{repo}/actions/tasks` can be used to track the progress of a workflow, but you need at least that workflow's run_id and the quantity of its child jobs. Tracking workflow progress is especially important if you want to chain together multiple workflows that exist within different repositories, which is desired for https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/6312.
- Make it possible to track the progress of manually triggered workflows by modifying the `/repos/{owner}/{repo}/actions/workflows/{workflowname}/dispatches` to return a JSON object containing the triggered workflow's id and a list of its child job names.
Co-authored-by: Andrii Chyrva <achyrva@amcbridge.com>
Co-authored-by: Andrii Chyrva <andrii.s.chyrva@hotmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7193
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: markturney <markturney@gmail.com>
Co-committed-by: markturney <markturney@gmail.com>
Improve consistency of these tag/branch selector menus between these areas: repo file/dir view, issue branch selection, compare page.
Improve the look slightly by aligning icons properly, adding consistent gap and ensuring consistent vertical gaps with no excessive space waste.
Preview:
https://codeberg.org/attachments/0740a811-d6bf-4c27-a16d-bdc7e2aa63eb
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7187
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Corrected miss-spelled description for the `is_private` field on `repoSearch`, in which 'public' was spelled as 'pubic'.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7199
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: luxzi <lesson085@gmail.com>
Co-committed-by: luxzi <lesson085@gmail.com>
The related CSS `milestone-card` is used in 3 places:
* global milestone view `/milestones`
* per-repo milestone view
* per-user/org projects view
The first two had gaps too small basically provided by whitespace. The latter was using an unusually large gap via tailwind.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7174
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Allow translating theme names. Not even for i18n reasons but because this way the menu is clearer and cleaner.
The number of translated entries is kept minimal for now. It is easy to pollute locales with these names otherwise.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7168
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
- Replies to pending review comments no longer generate a notification, this was caused by an incomplete determination if the comment was part of the pending review or not.
- The logic was reworked to do the following if it's part of a pending review: It is not a single review and if it's a reply then the comment it is replying to is part of a pending review.
- Added integration test.
- Resolvesforgejo/forgejo#7151
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7167
Reviewed-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Co-committed-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
- Issue title rendering can lead to nested `<a>` which is incorrect. So
revert a portion of forgejo/forgejo#6715.
- Integration test adjusted
- Resolvesforgejo/forgejo#7076
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7171
Reviewed-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Co-committed-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
18px is not a size used for icons often. In these cases it was also inconsistent with most of the UI.
Affected areas:
* `filter_list` - dropdown, filtering repo issues by project
* `filter_actions` - dropdown, mass-editing issues via issue list
* `sidebar/projects` - dropdown in issue view
* `new_form` - dropdown when creating issue. Projects must be enabled in repo
So all areas are dropdowns. I think these were inconsistent because other dropdowns like Reviewers and Milestones use the usual icons of 16px.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7175
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
- Add the ability to regenerate existing access tokens in the UI. This preserves the ID of the access token, but generates a new salt and token contents.
- Integration test added.
- Unit test added.
- Resolves#6880
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/6963
Reviewed-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Dmitrii Sharshakov <d3dx12.xx@gmail.com>
Co-committed-by: Dmitrii Sharshakov <d3dx12.xx@gmail.com>
## Dropping SSPI auth support
SSPI authentication relied on Microsoft Windows support, removal started in https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/5353, because it was broken anyway. We have no knowledge of any users using SSPI authentication. However, if you somehow managed to run Forgejo on Windows, or want to upgrade from a Gitea version which does, please ensure that you do not use SSPI as an authentication mechanism for user accounts. Feel free to reach out if you need assistance.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7148
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Reviewed-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Otto Richter <otto@codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: Otto Richter <otto@codeberg.org>
Closes: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/6042
Continuation of: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/6284
Replaces: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/6285
Context: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/6284#issuecomment-2518599
Create a new type of comment: `CommentTypeAggregator`
Replaces the grouping of labels and review request in a single place: the comment aggregator
The whole list of comments is "scanned", if they can get aggregated (diff of time < 60secs, same poster, open / close issue, add / del labels, add /del review req), they are added to the aggregator.
Once needed, the list of all the aggregated comments are replaced with a single aggregated comment containing all the data required.
In templates, have a specific HTML rendering part for the comment aggregator, reuse the same rendering as with the other types of comments.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/6523
Reviewed-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Reviewed-by: Otto <otto@codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Litchi Pi <litchi.pi@proton.me>
Co-committed-by: Litchi Pi <litchi.pi@proton.me>
So it is consistent with the icon used in the tab with comments.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7099
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
- In the case that the `ROOT_URL` does not match the site a person is visiting Forgejo gives zero guarantees that any of the functionality will still work.
- Make the error i18n, use `local_next`.
- Reflect in the error that the any part of the application can break, don't be specific - it is plain wrong and should not be used.
- Always check for this case on the login page. This was previously only the case if OAuth2 was enabled, but this code was checking for elements that are always present on the login page regardless if the OAuth2 was enabled or not. Technically nothing changed, but reading the code it is now more clear when this check is being run.
- Add E2E testing.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7103
Reviewed-by: Otto <otto@codeberg.org>
Reviewed-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Co-committed-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
The main change here is to use `datalist` for pronouns This supports
(see also docs[1]):
* Displaying the value already set by the user (if any), otherwise
* Presenting a list of common options to the user, and
* Allowing them to freely enter any value
This setup requires no additional JS and resolves[2].
This is different from the previous flow which used, if JS was available:
* A menu for a default 'recognised' set of pronouns, and if the user
wanted another value:
* An extra text div if the user wanted to enter custom pronouns
Without JS enabled both the menu and the custom text div would always be
displayed.
This change means there's no longer a distinction between 'custom' and
'recognised' pronouns (this difference looks to have only been made in
code, and not in any data models).
Link: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML/Element/datalist [1]
Link: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/6774 [2]
Co-authored-by: Matthew Hughes <matthewhughes934@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/6835
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Reviewed-by: Otto <otto@codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: mhughes9 <mhughes9@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: mhughes9 <mhughes9@noreply.codeberg.org>
The button to insert an URL now opens a dialog prompting for the two
components, the URL and the description.
Any existing text selection is taken into account to pre-fill the
description field.
Closes: #6731
Co-authored-by: Otto Richter <otto@codeberg.org>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7006
Reviewed-by: Otto <otto@codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Lucas Schwiderski <lucas@lschwiderski.de>
Co-committed-by: Lucas Schwiderski <lucas@lschwiderski.de>
- directly click email address
- show prohibited login state
## Testing
- visit admin panel
- visit a user
- click on "view details"
- check that email address is clickable and opens local email editor
- check that "suspended account" status is visible
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7062
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Otto Richter <git@otto.splvs.net>
Co-committed-by: Otto Richter <git@otto.splvs.net>
This pull request edits the head_navbar template and adds spacing
between the icon and the text inside the sign in button of the navbar
(button which displays at the top right of Gitea's pages when the user
is not signed in).
It bugged me that there was no spacing between the button's contents so
I test ran this change quickly on my server and thought it looked a lot
better, so decided to make this pull request. Up to you to decide if you
agree that it looks better :)
(cherry picked from commit 62389dd08b620cf0fd76567e0141e8b024c0b62b)
