Previously, trying to view files that were annexed, but missing, just
led to an uninformative error 500. This was rather confusing.
With these changes it now shows the pointer target instead of the
(missing) content of the file, and also indicates this situation in the
"stored with git-annex" message. For semantic correctness views for
missing files return a 404 instead of a 200, as they would with the
content present.
Fixes#7, fixes#13.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/matrss/forgejo-aneksajo/pulls/28
Co-authored-by: Matthias Riße <m.risse@fz-juelich.de>
Co-committed-by: Matthias Riße <m.risse@fz-juelich.de>
This updates the repo index/file view endpoints so annex files match the way
LFS files are rendered, making annexed files accessible via the web instead of
being black boxes only accessible by git clone.
This mostly just duplicates the existing LFS logic. It doesn't try to combine itself
with the existing logic, to make merging with upstream easier. If upstream ever
decides to accept, I would like to try to merge the redundant logic.
The one bit that doesn't directly copy LFS is my choice to hide annex-symlinks.
LFS files are always _pointer files_ and therefore always render with the "file"
icon and no special label, but annex files come in two flavours: symlinks or
pointer files. I've conflated both kinds to try to give a consistent experience.
The tests in here ensure the correct download link (/media, from the last PR)
renders in both the toolbar and, if a binary file (like most annexed files will be),
in the main pane, but it also adds quite a bit of code to make sure text files
that happen to be annexed are dug out and rendered inline like LFS files are.
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8112Fixes#6983.
I suppose a change like this doesn't require any testing?
## Checklist
The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org).
### Tests
- I added test coverage for Go changes...
- [ ] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests.
- [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server.
- I added test coverage for JavaScript changes...
- [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested.
- [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)).
### Documentation
- [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change.
- [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it.
### Release notes
- [x] I do not want this change to show in the release notes.
- [ ] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request.
- [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title.
Co-authored-by: Malte Jürgens <maltejur@dismail.de>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8120
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7640
Currently, if you have a mirrored repo, the button on the "branches"
page to create a new branch is available to be pressed. Once you name
your new branch and click submit, you get a 404 page that doesn't explain
what went wrong.
As new branch creation is not supported on mirrored repos, let's just
take that button away if the repo is a mirror. This is already done for
archived repos, so we just need to add another check.
Fixes#7639.
Co-authored-by: John Moon <john.moon@vts-i.com>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7869
Reviewed-by: Otto <otto@codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
On large screens, use grid to force right position of the button.
On small screens, just left it hang out wherever it fits. It's not possible to not make it hide behind mergebox while keeping `float`, and with grid it would overflow too much.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7746
Reviewed-by: Otto <otto@codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
(cherry picked from commit 0383e2e15a)
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7581
Followup to _many PRs_ where the old switches were converted to this one.
The main change here is to the switch with counter. It was missing a gap.
Additionally, it removes tailwind helpers the other switches retained from before switch refactors, because they are now using gap.
Co-authored-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7589
Reviewed-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7584
Followup to #6523
Reverts icon change introduced in #5695
It went unnoticed since v10 and was likely caused by bad copy paste and I don't think it's really worth a test.
Co-authored-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7585
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
**Backport of forgejo/forgejo#7422**
- Add new translations, if an existing one couldn't be used.
- Use existing translations, if one existed and fit the purpose.
- Spotted by the lint-locale-usage tooling by @fogti.
(cherry picked from commit bd9366e7fc)
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7430
Reviewed-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Co-committed-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Improve consistency of these tag/branch selector menus between these areas: repo file/dir view, issue branch selection, compare page.
Improve the look slightly by aligning icons properly, adding consistent gap and ensuring consistent vertical gaps with no excessive space waste.
Preview:
https://codeberg.org/attachments/0740a811-d6bf-4c27-a16d-bdc7e2aa63eb
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7187
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
The related CSS `milestone-card` is used in 3 places:
* global milestone view `/milestones`
* per-repo milestone view
* per-user/org projects view
The first two had gaps too small basically provided by whitespace. The latter was using an unusually large gap via tailwind.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7174
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
- Replies to pending review comments no longer generate a notification, this was caused by an incomplete determination if the comment was part of the pending review or not.
- The logic was reworked to do the following if it's part of a pending review: It is not a single review and if it's a reply then the comment it is replying to is part of a pending review.
- Added integration test.
- Resolvesforgejo/forgejo#7151
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7167
Reviewed-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Co-committed-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
18px is not a size used for icons often. In these cases it was also inconsistent with most of the UI.
Affected areas:
* `filter_list` - dropdown, filtering repo issues by project
* `filter_actions` - dropdown, mass-editing issues via issue list
* `sidebar/projects` - dropdown in issue view
* `new_form` - dropdown when creating issue. Projects must be enabled in repo
So all areas are dropdowns. I think these were inconsistent because other dropdowns like Reviewers and Milestones use the usual icons of 16px.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7175
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Closes: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/6042
Continuation of: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/6284
Replaces: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/6285
Context: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/6284#issuecomment-2518599
Create a new type of comment: `CommentTypeAggregator`
Replaces the grouping of labels and review request in a single place: the comment aggregator
The whole list of comments is "scanned", if they can get aggregated (diff of time < 60secs, same poster, open / close issue, add / del labels, add /del review req), they are added to the aggregator.
Once needed, the list of all the aggregated comments are replaced with a single aggregated comment containing all the data required.
In templates, have a specific HTML rendering part for the comment aggregator, reuse the same rendering as with the other types of comments.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/6523
Reviewed-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Reviewed-by: Otto <otto@codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Litchi Pi <litchi.pi@proton.me>
Co-committed-by: Litchi Pi <litchi.pi@proton.me>
This adds links to download a directory as archive. This can be useful if you e.g. just want to download a assets directory instead of the full source tree. The logic already exists in the backend, so only the frontend had been changed.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/4736
Reviewed-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: JakobDev <jakobdev@gmx.de>
Co-committed-by: JakobDev <jakobdev@gmx.de>
closes#6909
related to forgejo/design#14
# Description
Adds the following boolean operators for issues when using an indexer (with minor caveats)
- `+term`: `term` MUST be present for any result
- `-term`: negation; exclude results that contain `term`
- `"this is a term"`: matches the exact phrase `this is a term`
In all cases the special characters may be escaped by the prefix `\`
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/6952
Reviewed-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Reviewed-by: Otto <otto@codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Shiny Nematoda <snematoda.751k2@aleeas.com>
Co-committed-by: Shiny Nematoda <snematoda.751k2@aleeas.com>
- adds the `toml` plugin to the `eslint` linting → expect to have `options/setting/config.toml` by #6862
- fixes `make lint-codespell` commands
- related concerning `codespell`: #3270
- info: codespell check is and was not activated in the workflows (could maybe, runs only few seconds on my system)
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7007
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Robert Wolff <mahlzahn@posteo.de>
Co-committed-by: Robert Wolff <mahlzahn@posteo.de>
I noticed that the icon next to the GPG key reference appears to be incorrect for commits signed by the default GPG key.
Looking into the commit history of the template file, I noticed that Forgejo-signed commits originally had a distinct icon:
gitea-unlock-cog --> octicon-shield-lock --> octicon-unverified (current)
Since octicon-unverified is also used when a commit cannot be verified (.Verification.Warning), I find it misleading for successfully signed commits. This PR changes the icon to the verified variant for better clarity.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/6803
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Reviewed-by: Otto <otto@codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: shgew <shgew@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: shgew <shgew@noreply.codeberg.org>
## Changes
* same as https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/6201, but for role labels
* remove border
* decrease paddings
* all by simply removing `basic`
* I did check that no important properties were added by that class
* make the header itself more compact by decreasing paddings here too
* it's really large currently - being as high as single line content
* removed "review" label by @fnetX request
There was no heavy consideration behind these changes. I was just poking around the area from time to time and finally decided to submit something. If you think there's more consideration needed, please tell!
## Preview
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/6816
Reviewed-by: Beowulf <beowulf@beocode.eu>
Reviewed-by: Otto <otto@codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
This PR adds a small icon link to the file history list to open the diff for *only* this file in the respective commit. This is very useful if the commit in question touches a very large amount of files and finding the actual file in the diff is tedious.
- fixes#6596
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/6599
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Yann Büchau <nobodyinperson@posteo.de>
Co-committed-by: Yann Büchau <nobodyinperson@posteo.de>
Closes#6485
Adds a bit of javascript in the template responsible for the "create release" page
When typing a name in the "tag name" field, the content will be automatically set in the "Title" field as a placeholder.
This way, you can type a version number (ex: `v5.0.2`), and the title will default to it (`v5.0.2` in this case)
## Checklist
The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org).
### Tests
- I added test coverage for Go changes...
- [ ] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests.
- [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server.
- I added test coverage for JavaScript changes...
- [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested.
- [x] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)).
### Documentation
- [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change.
- [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it.
### Release notes
- [x] I do not want this change to show in the release notes.
- [ ] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request.
- [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/6645
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Litchi Pi <litchi.pi@proton.me>
Co-committed-by: Litchi Pi <litchi.pi@proton.me>
* disable the "Finish review" button on PR/files page for archived repos - trying to review PRs in such repos results in JS error
* wrap the button in a div and move tooltips here to make them actually display on a disabled button - currently they do not
* added simple testing
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/6729
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
The benefit / functionality provided by DiffFileList is already (better)
integrated in the header of the files.
If you want an overview, you can collapse all files via the same
overflow menu (where the stats were available).
To reduce the maintenance effort, the DiffFileList component is
therefore removed.
Regressions of #6459 and #6542:
`templates/repo/issue/navbar.tmpl`:
* `issue-list-navbar` is the ordering class which was incorrectly removed
* and then it was incorrectly replaced with `list-header-toggle`
`templates/repo/issue/openclose.tmpl`:
* it did not have ordering rules in the first place
* but then `list-header-toggle` was incorrectly applied to it
Thanks to @fnetX for spotting and notifying!
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/6576
Reviewed-by: Otto <otto@codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
[skip ci] no relevant tests
Followup to https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/6459.
This PR applies the new switch design to areas where it is simple to apply and no other interventions are needed other than switching classes.
Also, added back the utility class `list-header-toggle` to a few places where it was removed in https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/6459. It is used for item reordering on smaller screens and it isn't actually needed in those areas (does nothing because of too wide elements), but it wasn't supposed to be removed.
The affected areas also include the menus in notifications. This is a followup to https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/3175 which should make the unchosen item look more obviously as an interactive element.
## Preview
|Area|Before|After|
|-|-|-|
|`projects/list.tmpl`||
|`repo/issue/navbar.tmp`||No visible change|
|`repo/issue/openclose.tmpl`||No visible change|
|`.../dashboard/issues.tmpl`||
|`.../dashboard/milestones.tmpl`||
|`.../notification_div.tmpl`||
|`.../notification_subscriptions.tmpl`||
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/6542
Reviewed-by: Otto <otto@codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Closes https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/1120
- Adds labels to reaction and context menu.
- Fixes taborder in markdown combobox buttons. They are now only one
"tab" stop and can be navigated with arrow buttons and in the right
order (previously, it would skip the table button).
- Generates more verbose output for the reactio selectors to provide
content for users who cannot identify the meaning of these buttons
visually. Explicit aria-labels are now preferred over auto-generated
ones.
