This adds tests for creating a repository using the push-to-create
feature. The tests are the equivalent of doing
```
git remote add origin <url>
git annex sync --content
```
in a local git-annex repository.
The steps it does are:
1. create a local git-annex repository
2. add a non-existing repository as a remote
3. sync using `git annex sync --content`
It then checks that:
- the repository was indeed created
- the default branch matches the HEAD of the local repository
- all annexed files exist on the remote and have the correct content
This is done both for a repository in a user's namespace and for a
repository in an organization's namespace.
This changes the PR merge process such that annexed files contained in the to-be-merged commits are copied from the head repository to the base repository as part of the merge, similar to how it is done for LFS files.
Fixes#11.
The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org).
- I added test coverage for Go changes...
- [ ] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests.
- [x] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server.
- I added test coverage for JavaScript changes...
- [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested.
- [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)).
- [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change.
- [ ] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it.
- [x] I do not want this change to show in the release notes.
- [ ] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request.
- [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo-aneksajo/forgejo-aneksajo/pulls/62
Co-authored-by: Matthias Riße <m.risse@fz-juelich.de>
Co-committed-by: Matthias Riße <m.risse@fz-juelich.de>
This adds a new endpoint under `/git-annex-p2phttp` which acts as an
authenticating proxy to git-annex' p2phttp server. This makes it
possible to set `annex+<server-url>/git-annex-p2phttp` as
`remote.<name>.annexurl` and use git-annex fully over http(s) with the
normal credentials and access tokens provided by Forgejo.
Fixes#25.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/matrss/forgejo-aneksajo/pulls/42
Co-authored-by: Matthias Riße <m.risse@fz-juelich.de>
Co-committed-by: Matthias Riße <m.risse@fz-juelich.de>
This adds some rudimentary tests that drop files in a repository's clone
as well as from a repository on Forgejo.
Fixes#4.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/matrss/forgejo-aneksajo/pulls/47
Co-authored-by: Matthias Riße <m.risse@fz-juelich.de>
Co-committed-by: Matthias Riße <m.risse@fz-juelich.de>
The `git annex testremote` command runs a built-in set of tests against
a remote. It cannot hurt to check our implementation of a git-annex
remote against it too.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/matrss/forgejo-aneksajo/pulls/48
Co-authored-by: Matthias Riße <m.risse@fz-juelich.de>
Co-committed-by: Matthias Riße <m.risse@fz-juelich.de>
The previous implementation both uploaded to the annex and pushed to the
git repository. This meant that the tests checking that uploads without
permission fail actually could pass when the git push failed but the
git-annex upload didn't. The tests didn't catch the situation where
unauthorized users could modify the annex.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/matrss/forgejo-aneksajo/pulls/46
Co-authored-by: Matthias Riße <m.risse@fz-juelich.de>
Co-committed-by: Matthias Riße <m.risse@fz-juelich.de>
This implements support for uploading files into the annex using the web
interface.
If a repository is a git-annex-enabled repository all files will be
added to it using git annex add. This means that the repository's
configuration for what to put into the annex (annex.largefiles in
gitattributes) will be respected.
Plain git repositories without git-annex will work as before, directly
uploading to git.
Fixes#5.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/matrss/forgejo-aneksajo/pulls/21
Co-authored-by: Matthias Riße <m.risse@fz-juelich.de>
Co-committed-by: Matthias Riße <m.risse@fz-juelich.de>
This updates the repo index/file view endpoints so annex files match the way
LFS files are rendered, making annexed files accessible via the web instead of
being black boxes only accessible by git clone.
This mostly just duplicates the existing LFS logic. It doesn't try to combine itself
with the existing logic, to make merging with upstream easier. If upstream ever
decides to accept, I would like to try to merge the redundant logic.
The one bit that doesn't directly copy LFS is my choice to hide annex-symlinks.
LFS files are always _pointer files_ and therefore always render with the "file"
icon and no special label, but annex files come in two flavours: symlinks or
pointer files. I've conflated both kinds to try to give a consistent experience.
The tests in here ensure the correct download link (/media, from the last PR)
renders in both the toolbar and, if a binary file (like most annexed files will be),
in the main pane, but it also adds quite a bit of code to make sure text files
that happen to be annexed are dug out and rendered inline like LFS files are.
Previously, Gitea's LFS support allowed direct-downloads of LFS content,
via http://$HOSTNAME:$PORT/$USER/$REPO/media/branch/$BRANCH/$FILE
Expand that grace to git-annex too. Now /media should provide the
relevant *content* from the .git/annex/objects/ folder.
This adds tests too. And expands the tests to try symlink-based annexing,
since /media implicitly supports both that and pointer-file-based annexing.
The git repository must be closed after using it. Without this change
some tests started to fail due to the lingering repository running into
a timeout.
This moves the `annexObjectPath()` helper out of the tests and into a
dedicated sub-package as `annex.ContentLocation()`, and expands it with
`.Pointer()` (which validates using `git annex examinekey`),
`.IsAnnexed()` and `.Content()` to make it a more useful module.
The tests retain their own wrapper version of `ContentLocation()`
because I tried to follow close to the API modules/lfs uses, which in
terms of abstract `git.Blob` and `git.TreeEntry` objects, not in terms
of `repoPath string`s which are more convenient for the tests.
This makes HTTP symmetric with SSH clone URLs.
This gives us the fancy feature of _anonymous_ downloads,
so people can access datasets without having to set up an
account or manage ssh keys.
Previously, to access "open access" data shared this way,
users would need to:
1. Create an account on gitea.example.com
2. Create ssh keys
3. Upload ssh keys (and make sure to find and upload the correct file)
4. `git clone git@gitea.example.com:user/dataset.git`
5. `cd dataset`
6. `git annex get`
This cuts that down to just the last three steps:
1. `git clone https://gitea.example.com/user/dataset.git`
2. `cd dataset`
3. `git annex get`
This is significantly simpler for downstream users, especially for those
unfamiliar with the command line.
Unfortunately there's no uploading. While git-annex supports uploading
over HTTP to S3 and some other special remotes, it seems to fail on a
_plain_ HTTP remote. See https://github.com/neuropoly/gitea/issues/7
and https://git-annex.branchable.com/forum/HTTP_uploads/#comment-ce28adc128fdefe4c4c49628174d9b92.
This is not a major loss since no one wants uploading to be anonymous anyway.
To support private repos, I had to hunt down and patch a secret extra security
corner that Gitea only applies to HTTP for some reason (services/auth/basic.go).
This was guided by https://git-annex.branchable.com/tips/setup_a_public_repository_on_a_web_site/
Fixes https://github.com/neuropoly/gitea/issues/3
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Guay-Paquet <mathieu.guaypaquet@polymtl.ca>
Fixes https://github.com/neuropoly/gitea/issues/11
Tests:
* `git annex init`
* `git annex copy --from origin`
* `git annex copy --to origin`
over:
* ssh
for:
* the owner
* a collaborator
* a read-only collaborator
* a stranger
in a
* public repo
* private repo
And then confirms:
* Deletion of the remote repo (to ensure lockdown isn't messing with us: https://git-annex.branchable.com/internals/lockdown/#comment-0cc5225dc5abe8eddeb843bfd2fdc382)
------
To support all this:
* Add util.FileCmp()
* Patch withKeyFile() so it can be nested in other copies of itself
-------
Many thanks to Mathieu for giving style tips and catching several bugs,
including a subtle one in util.filecmp() which neutered it.
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Guay-Paquet <mathieu.guay-paquet@polymtl.ca>
Co-authored-by: Matthias Riße <m.risse@fz-juelich.de>
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8155
* convert updateRepoUnits to not rely on ctx to retrieve the repo
* Add integration test
* do not activate releases if `wiki: true`. This is unexpected and there is no evidence it is necessary.
Refs https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/8082
---
The test is minimal for the sake of backporting. It is verified to reproduce the bug if the fix is not present.
```sh
$ make TAGS='sqlite sqlite_unlock_notify' 'test-sqlite#TestAPIRepoMigrate'
...
=== TestAPIRepoMigrate (tests/integration/api_repo_test.go:388)
--- FAIL: TestAPIRepoMigrate (1.12s)
testlogger.go:411: 2025/06/11 17:38:22 ...les/storage/local.go:33:NewLocalStorage() [I] Creating new Local Storage at /home/earl-warren/software/forgejo/tests/gitea-lfs-meta
testlogger.go:411: 2025/06/11 17:38:22 ...eb/routing/logger.go:102:func1() [I] router: completed GET /user/login for test-mock:12345, 200 OK in 2.1ms @ auth/auth.go:145(auth.SignIn)
testlogger.go:411: 2025/06/11 17:38:22 ...eb/routing/logger.go:102:func1() [I] router: completed POST /user/login for test-mock:12345, 303 See Other in 2.1ms @ auth/auth.go:179(auth.SignInPost)
testlogger.go:411: 2025/06/11 17:38:22 ...eb/routing/logger.go:102:func1() [I] router: completed GET /user/settings/applications for test-mock:12345, 200 OK in 3.8ms @ setting/applications.go:25(setting.Applications)
testlogger.go:411: 2025/06/11 17:38:22 ...eb/routing/logger.go:102:func1() [I] router: completed POST /user/settings/applications for test-mock:12345, 303 See Other in 5.1ms @ setting/applications.go:35(setting.ApplicationsPost)
testlogger.go:411: 2025/06/11 17:38:22 ...eb/routing/logger.go:102:func1() [I] router: completed GET /user/settings/applications for test-mock:12345, 200 OK in 2.9ms @ setting/applications.go:25(setting.Applications)
testlogger.go:411: 2025/06/11 17:38:23 ...eb/routing/logger.go:102:func1() [I] router: completed POST /api/v1/repos/migrate for test-mock:12345, 0 in 992.0ms @ repo/migrate.go:38(repo.Migrate)
api_repo_test.go:400:
Error Trace: /home/earl-warren/software/forgejo/tests/integration/api_repo_test.go:400
Error: Not equal:
expected: 201
actual : 200
Test: TestAPIRepoMigrate
api_repo_test.go:402:
Error Trace: /home/earl-warren/software/forgejo/tests/integration/integration_test.go:649
/home/earl-warren/software/forgejo/tests/integration/api_repo_test.go:402
Error: Received unexpected error:
EOF
Test: TestAPIRepoMigrate
```
## Checklist
The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org).
### Tests
- I added test coverage for Go changes...
- [ ] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests.
- [x] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server.
- I added test coverage for JavaScript changes...
- [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested.
- [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)).
### Documentation
- [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change.
- [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it.
### Release notes
- [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes.
- [x] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request.
- [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title.
<!--start release-notes-assistant-->
## Release notes
<!--URL:https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo-->
- Bug fixes
- [PR](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8155): <!--number 8155 --><!--line 0 --><!--description ZG8gbm90IGZhaWwgd2hlbiByZWxlYXNlIG9yIHdpa2kgaXMgc2V0IGluIGAvcmVwb3MvbWlncmF0ZWAgQVBJ-->do not fail when release or wiki is set in `/repos/migrate` API<!--description-->
<!--end release-notes-assistant-->
Co-authored-by: Earl Warren <contact@earl-warren.org>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8167
Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7640
Currently, if you have a mirrored repo, the button on the "branches"
page to create a new branch is available to be pressed. Once you name
your new branch and click submit, you get a 404 page that doesn't explain
what went wrong.
As new branch creation is not supported on mirrored repos, let's just
take that button away if the repo is a mirror. This is already done for
archived repos, so we just need to add another check.
Fixes#7639.
Co-authored-by: John Moon <john.moon@vts-i.com>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7869
Reviewed-by: Otto <otto@codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7773
- I was not able to find a reasoning in the pull request (https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/9784) for the existence of this `time.Sleep`. The best I could come up with during manual testing is that there's a brief moment where 'this pull request is missing fork information' is shown, this was caused by an incorrect condition.
- Added integration test.
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7774
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Test two scenarios:
1. Account linking is set to `auto` and tries to link against a user who
is enrolled into Webauthn should show 2FA screen.
2. User is already linked and logins via OAuth2 and is enrolled into
WebAuthn should show 2FA screen.
(cherry picked from commit aa4ae81fe0)
- A permission check is done when incoming SSH connections are handled (this is
run before git hooks). If this check is for write access and AGit flow
is supported, then this check is degraded to a read check. The
motivation behind this is that for AGit flow the user does not need
write permissions but only read permissions.
- The `if` condition cannot check if this is for AGit flow, as the Git
protocol has not run yet and thus has to delay this permission check.
This `if` condition failed to consider that this also might be run for
LFS which does not care about AGit flow and would not do a delayed
permission check, so ensure that this degradition only happens when the
`git-receive-pack` command is being run (which roughly equals to `git
push`).
- Clarify code comment.
- Added integration test.
(cherry picked from commit 60c1af244a)
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7683
- The OAuthCallback code that is responsible for creating a new user, if one does not exist yet, did not use `[service].ALLOW_ONLY_EXTERNAL_REGISTRATION` as default value for the restricted field of a user.
- Resolvesforgejo/forgejo#7681
- Add integration test.
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7688
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7648
The only parameter that is ever used is a single directory, make it that only instead of a more complex option structure.
Remove tests.AddFixtures that was the simpler form because it is now redundant.
---
Backporting to v11.0 will help with automated backporting of bug fixes in need of custom made fixtures.
Co-authored-by: Earl Warren <contact@earl-warren.org>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7649
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
- The pagination labels 'First', 'Previous', 'Next' and 'Last' are
hidden away when the screen width becomes smaller. However this also
hides them from the screen reader. Instead of using `display: none`, use
some well-known tricks to still make them visible to the screen reader.
- Add E2E test.
- ResolvesCodeberg/Community#1858
(cherry picked from commit b6072496d4)
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7594
Fixes https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/7591
Followup to https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/6203
Without the 3rd commit, when this test runs, an error message appears in the logs:
```
[E] Missing translation "incorrect_root_url"
```
With it, it does not. No changes to the actual locale handling are expected and I'm hoping there's enough other testing in place for that.
Reported-by: Paweł Bogusławski <pboguslawski@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7599
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7261
- When trying to view a submodule directory via the normal `/src/branch/` path, generate a redirect link to the submodule location.
- Resolvesforgejo/forgejo#5267
Co-authored-by: Gnarwhal <git.aspect893@passmail.net>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7450
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7395
- Add `binding:"In(...)"` to the `default_merge_style` and `default_update_style` fields to only accept recognized merge and update styles.
- Resolvesforgejo/forgejo#7389
- Added integration test for the API (`binding` works in the exact same way for the API and web routes).
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7401
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7355
- Always initialize `RequestedReviewers` and `RequestedReviewersTeams`, this avoids the JSON encoder from encoding it to the zero value `null` and instead return a empty array.
- Resolves#4108
- Integration test added.
Co-authored-by: ThomasBoom89 <thomasboom89@noreply.codeberg.org>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7365
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7344
- This makes the `repo-settings` e2e testing happy.
- There's no point into checking `vertical-align`; it has no effect when `position: absolute` is set, which is is currently set unconditionally for checkboxes and radios on forms.
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7345
Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
- This is a follow up on #7193 and resolves#6312.
- The ID by itself is not very useful, so also return the index of the workflow run.
Co-authored-by: Klaus Fyhn <klausfyhn@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Klaus Fyhn <klfj@mir-robots.com>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7286
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: klausfyhn <klausfyhn@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: klausfyhn <klausfyhn@noreply.codeberg.org>
Per #6507, platform information was missing from the rubygems package registry, so binary gems where not served correctly. This change adds the platform information when necessary.
Co-authored-by: f <f@sutty.nl>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7257
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: fauno <fauno@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: fauno <fauno@noreply.codeberg.org>
- `releasesToFeedItems` is called to convert release structs to feed items, which is then used to render RSS or Atom feeds.
- Optimize the loading of attributes for the releases, introduce `ReleaseList` type which uses caching to load repository and publishers. It also no longer loads release attachments and downloads counts as that is not used in feed items.
- Optimize the composing of meta by introducing caching, this operation is especially slow when the owner is an organization.
- Add unit test (ensures new `LoadAttributes` works correctly).
- Add integration test (ensures that feed output is still as expected).
Loading https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/releases.rss reduced from ~15s to ~1s. (It is currently is deployed on codeberg.org)
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7221
Reviewed-by: Otto <otto@codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Co-committed-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
- When the API endpoint `/repos/{owner}/{repo}/actions/workflows/{workflowname}/dispatches` is used to launch a workflow, it currently returns no data; `/repos/{owner}/{repo}/actions/tasks` can be used to track the progress of a workflow, but you need at least that workflow's run_id and the quantity of its child jobs. Tracking workflow progress is especially important if you want to chain together multiple workflows that exist within different repositories, which is desired for https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/6312.
- Make it possible to track the progress of manually triggered workflows by modifying the `/repos/{owner}/{repo}/actions/workflows/{workflowname}/dispatches` to return a JSON object containing the triggered workflow's id and a list of its child job names.
Co-authored-by: Andrii Chyrva <achyrva@amcbridge.com>
Co-authored-by: Andrii Chyrva <andrii.s.chyrva@hotmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7193
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: markturney <markturney@gmail.com>
Co-committed-by: markturney <markturney@gmail.com>
Fuzzy searching for code has been known to be problematic #5264 and in my personal opinion isn't very useful.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/6947
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Shiny Nematoda <snematoda.751k2@aleeas.com>
Co-committed-by: Shiny Nematoda <snematoda.751k2@aleeas.com>
Allow translating theme names. Not even for i18n reasons but because this way the menu is clearer and cleaner.
The number of translated entries is kept minimal for now. It is easy to pollute locales with these names otherwise.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7168
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
- Replies to pending review comments no longer generate a notification, this was caused by an incomplete determination if the comment was part of the pending review or not.
- The logic was reworked to do the following if it's part of a pending review: It is not a single review and if it's a reply then the comment it is replying to is part of a pending review.
- Added integration test.
- Resolvesforgejo/forgejo#7151
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7167
Reviewed-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Co-committed-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
- Issue title rendering can lead to nested `<a>` which is incorrect. So
revert a portion of forgejo/forgejo#6715.
- Integration test adjusted
- Resolvesforgejo/forgejo#7076
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7171
Reviewed-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Co-committed-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
- Instead of using `...`, use the unicode character for ellipsis `…`.
- According to weblate: Using the Unicode character is in most cases the better approach and looks better rendered, and may sound better with text-to-speech.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7154
Reviewed-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Reviewed-by: Otto <otto@codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Co-committed-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
