The change in 5816106de5 made a bug
visible with which it was possible to read annexed content from a
private repository without having read access to it.
Prior to that commit this bug could only be triggered by having a git
version <2.29. I'd expect everyone to use a newer version than that for
a while now.
The fix is to require read permissions at a minimum for git-annex-shell
operations.
This fixes some issues when using a git-annex that is installed in a
different location than where git is installed, e.g. when using the
git-annex-standalone release or one installed with nix.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/matrss/forgejo-aneksajo/pulls/44
Co-authored-by: Matthias Riße <m.risse@fz-juelich.de>
Co-committed-by: Matthias Riße <m.risse@fz-juelich.de>
Copied from https://github.com/neuropoly/gitea/pull/47
This adds a check so that if `setting.Annex.Enabled` is true and git-annex is not in the PATH Forgejo will abort on startup with a reasonable error message.
Fixes#15.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/matrss/forgejo-aneksajo/pulls/16
Co-authored-by: Matthias Riße <m.risse@fz-juelich.de>
Co-committed-by: Matthias Riße <m.risse@fz-juelich.de>
[git-annex](https://git-annex.branchable.com/) is a more complicated cousin to
git-lfs, storing large files in an optional-download side content. Unlike lfs,
it allows mixing and matching storage remotes, so the content remote(s) doesn't
need to be on the same server as the git remote, making it feasible to scatter
a collection across cloud storage, old harddrives, or anywhere else storage can
be scavenged. Since this can get complicated, fast, it has a content-tracking
database (`git annex whereis`) to help find everything later.
The use-case we imagine for including it in Gitea is just the simple case, where
we're primarily emulating git-lfs: each repo has its large content at the same URL.
Our motivation is so we can self-host https://www.datalad.org/ datasets, which
currently are only hostable by fragilely scrounging together cloud storage --
and having to manage all the credentials associated with all the pieces -- or at
https://openneuro.org which is fragile in its own ways.
Supporting git-annex also allows multiple Gitea instance to be annex remotes for
each other, mirroring the content or otherwise collaborating the split up the
hosting costs.
Enabling
--------
TODO
HTTP
----
TODO
Permission Checking
-------------------
This tweaks the API in routers/private/serv.go to expose the calling user's
computed permission, instead of just returning HTTP 403.
This doesn't fit in super well. It's the opposite from how the git-lfs support is
done, where there's a complete list of possible subcommands and their matching
permission levels, and then the API compares the requested with the actual level
and returns HTTP 403 if the check fails.
But it's necessary. The main git-annex verbs, 'git-annex-shell configlist' and
'git-annex-shell p2pstdio' are both either read-only or read-write operations,
depending on the state on disk on either end of the connection and what the user
asked it to ask for, with no way to know before git-annex examines the situation.
So tell the level via GIT_ANNEX_READONLY and trust it to handle itself.
In the older Gogs version, the permission was directly read in cmd/serv.go:
```
mode, err = db.UserAccessMode(user.ID, repo)
```
- 966e925cf3/internal/cmd/serv.go (L334)
but in Gitea permission enforcement has been centralized in the API layer.
(perhaps so the cmd layer can avoid making direct DB connections?)
Deletion
--------
git-annex has this "lockdown" feature where it tries
really quite very hard to prevent you deleting its
data, to the point that even an rm -rf won't do it:
each file in annex/objects/ is nested inside a
folder with read-only permissions.
The recommended workaround is to run chmod -R +w when
you're sure you actually want to delete a repo. See
https://git-annex.branchable.com/internals/lockdown
So we edit util.RemoveAll() to do just that, so now
it's `chmod -R +w && rm -rf` instead of just `rm -rf`.
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8550
- The `ACME_URL` setting is documented to default to Let's encrypt
production server if left empty, so do precisely that.
- Use a HTTP proxy to communicate with ACME if Forgejo is configured to
use that.
- Regression of forgejo/forgejo#7409 (previously certmagic took care of
setting these defaults).
- Resolvesforgejo/forgejo#8548
## Testing
1. Configure Forgejo's root URL to a public facing domain (that can pass a ACME challenge)
2. Configure Forgejo to use ACME by setting `[server].ENABLE_ACME = true` and `[server].ACME_ACCEPTTOS = true`.
3. Start Forgejo.
4. Observe that it's available via https.
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8552
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
### Pull Request Description:
This Pull Request adds a new `admin user reset-mfa` option to the CLI which lets admins remove all two-factor authentication configurations for a user (both totp & passkey). Like with `reset-password` this lets admins help unblock users who might be locked out.
### Justification:
Although users are told to back up or store TOTP recovery keys in a safe place, this is hardly a fool-proof design (not the fault of Forgejo or Gitea), in addition, passkeys don't really provide any means of recovery should the key no longer be available. It's entirely possible to become totally locked out of your foregejo account because you cannot complete a two-factor challenge.
Providing a means to recover from this lockout scenario through the existing CLI tool parallels the scenario of forgetting a password.
## Checklist
The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org).
### Tests
- I added test coverage for Go changes...
- [ ] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests.
- [x] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server.
- I added test coverage for JavaScript changes...
- [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested.
- [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)).
### Documentation
- [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change.
- [ ] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it.
### Release notes
- [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes.
- [x] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request.
- [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title.
<!--start release-notes-assistant-->
## Release notes
<!--URL:https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo-->
- Features
- [PR](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8047): <!--number 8047 --><!--line 0 --><!--description QWRkcyBgYWRtaW4gdXNlciByZXNldC1tZmFgIENMSSBvcHRpb24=-->Adds `admin user reset-mfa` CLI option<!--description-->
<!--end release-notes-assistant-->
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8047
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Ian Spence <ian@ecnepsnai.com>
Co-committed-by: Ian Spence <ian@ecnepsnai.com>
> **Warning** note to self: update the docs CLI page right after it is merged.
Regression from https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8035
## Checklist
The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org).
### Tests
Check the USAGE line:
From the forgejo branch:
```sh
$ make TAGS='sqlite sqlite_unlock_notify' forgejo
$ ./forgejo help | head
./forgejo help | head
NAME:
Forgejo - Beyond coding. We forge.
USAGE:
Forgejo [global options] [command [command options]]
```
From this pull request:
```sh
$ make TAGS='sqlite sqlite_unlock_notify' forgejo
$ ./forgejo help | head
NAME:
forgejo - Beyond coding. We forge.
USAGE:
forgejo [global options] [command [command options]]
```
### Documentation
- [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change.
- [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it.
### Release notes
- [x] I do not want this change to show in the release notes.
- [ ] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request.
- [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8049
Reviewed-by: Michael Kriese <michael.kriese@gmx.de>
Co-authored-by: Earl Warren <contact@earl-warren.org>
Co-committed-by: Earl Warren <contact@earl-warren.org>
urfave/cli v2 will eventually become unmaintained, switch over to v3 which is the latest supported version.
Note: the `docs` command would be a lot of work to restore with v3 ([the package is still in alpha](https://github.com/urfave/cli-docs)) An alternative to avoid a breaking change would be to not upgrade from v2 to v3 for that reason alone.
Note: these commits were cherry-picked from https://code.forgejo.org/forgefriends/forgefriends
Note: it is best reviewed side by side with no display of whitespace changes (there are a lot of those when converting vars to func).
- a few functional changes were necessary and are noted in context in the file changes tab
- https://cli.urfave.org/migrate-v2-to-v3/ upgrade instructions were followed in the most minimal way possible
- upgrade gof3 to v3.10.8 which includes and upgrade from urfave/cli v2 to urfave/cli v3
- upgrade gitlab.com/gitlab-org/api/client-go v0.129.0 because it is an indirect dependency of gof3 and requires a change because of a deprecated field that otherwise triggers a lint error but nothing else otherwise
- verified that the [script](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs/src/branch/next/scripts/cli-docs.sh) that generates the [CLI documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs/src/branch/next/scripts/cli-docs.sh) still works. There are cosmetic differences and the **help** subcommand is no longer advertised (although it is still supported) but the `--help` option is advertised as expected so it is fine.
- end-to-end tests [passed](https://code.forgejo.org/forgejo/end-to-end/pulls/667) (they use the Forgejo CLI to some extent)
## Checklist
The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org).
### Tests
- I added test coverage for Go changes...
- [ ] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests.
- [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server.
- I added test coverage for JavaScript changes...
- [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested.
- [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)).
### Documentation
- [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change.
- [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it.
### Release notes
- [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes.
- [ ] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request.
- [x] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title.
<!--start release-notes-assistant-->
## Release notes
<!--URL:https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo-->
- Breaking features
- [PR](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8035): <!--number 8035 --><!--line 0 --><!--description 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-->The `forgejo docs` command is deprecated and CLI errors are now displayed on stderr instead of stdout. These breaking changes happened because the package used to parse the command line arguments was [upgraded from v2 to v3](https://cli.urfave.org/migrate-v2-to-v3/). A [separate project was initiated](https://github.com/urfave/cli-docs) to re-implement the `docs` command, but it is not yet production ready.<!--description-->
<!--end release-notes-assistant-->
Co-authored-by: limiting-factor <limiting-factor@posteo.com>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8035
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
- Use mock helper functions, instead of home-brew solutions.
- Disable cron jobs that are not important to be run during integration tests and might even interfere.
- Avoid sleeping unnecessary, if there's some requirement then sleep or retry until that requirement is met.
- Avoid trying to deliver webhooks that will always result in a failure.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7917
Reviewed-by: Michael Kriese <michael.kriese@gmx.de>
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Co-committed-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
## Checklist
The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org).
### Tests
- I added test coverage for Go changes...
- [ ] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests.
- [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server.
- I added test coverage for JavaScript changes...
- [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested.
- [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)).
### Documentation
- [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change.
- [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it.
### Release notes
- [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes.
- [x] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request.
- [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7409
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Gwendolyn <me@gwendolyn.dev>
Co-committed-by: Gwendolyn <me@gwendolyn.dev>
- Unify the usage of [`crypto/rand.Read`](https://pkg.go.dev/crypto/rand#Read) to `util.CryptoRandomBytes`.
- Refactor `util.CryptoRandomBytes` to never return an error. It is documented by Go, https://go.dev/issue/66821, to always succeed. So if we still receive a error or if the returned bytes read is not equal to the expected bytes to be read we panic (just to be on the safe side).
- This simplifies a lot of code to no longer care about error handling.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7453
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Co-committed-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
There are various commands of the Forgejo CLI that do not actually need Git, because i.e. they only issue network requests. Matter of fact, most occurrences do not actually require Git.
By removing the Git initialization, operations by e.g. the manager will not fail in the absence of a Git binary. This is mostly relevant for an in-the-works Landlock implementation, which aims to minimize access to paths depending on the situation. Although we should expect that Git will be installed on the same system that the user is running Forgejo from, it somewhat slows things down, whereas the same edge cases that we are trying to protect the user from _could_ be achieved by keeping the `setting.RepoRootPath` check.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7348
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Panagiotis "Ivory" Vasilopoulos <git@n0toose.net>
Co-committed-by: Panagiotis "Ivory" Vasilopoulos <git@n0toose.net>
- Create temporary directory inside of a temporary directory (useful for a work-in-progress Landlock implementation, as we will not want to "whitelist" the entirety of the /tmp directory in our case, i.e. /tmp/forgejo-dump-133552095).
- The database is always removed after dump is complete.
- The temporary directory is removed if no temporary directory has been explicitly set (as in, created by Forgejo in /tmp or equivalent).
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7350
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Panagiotis "Ivory" Vasilopoulos <git@n0toose.net>
Co-committed-by: Panagiotis "Ivory" Vasilopoulos <git@n0toose.net>
- Add a strong strict default robots.txt, if one is not provided by the instance administrators.
- Remove code for the legacy public asset path, the error has been logged for a few releases already (existed since v1.21).
- Resolvesforgejo/forgejo#923
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7387
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Reviewed-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Co-committed-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
- Add a new `Seq` function to the `Set` type, this returns an iterator over the values.
- Convert some users of the `Values` method to allow for more optimal code.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/6676
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Co-committed-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
And add more comments
(cherry picked from commit 4f386e2c5e39b860424faf4cbc02c16f641f956e)
Conflicts:
cmd/main_test.go
tests/integration/integration_test.go
trivial context conflicts
unset XDG_CONFIG_HOME early to enable gitea to manage git configuration.
simple error checking to satisfy the linting. Closes#33039
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit 233b7959e0518c47ef83c6a80c617546983433eb)
Closes#25898
The problem was that the default settings weren't being loaded
---------
Signed-off-by: cassiozareck <cassiomilczareck@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit 1e2c8eb494ff5b8378653db5fed876d824ebca6f)
Conflicts:
modules/setting/indexer.go
trivial context conflict
One might want to exclude this data when dumping, esp. since repository
archives are more of temporary data by nature.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Heiss <christoph@c8h4.io>
Since we have artifact fixtures now, some ids are in use. To avoid
reusing IDs, start them at 42, rather than 0. That's past the ids used
by the fixtures.
Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
- This a port of https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/31931 in a
behavior-sense. None of the code was actually ported.
- Follow up for #2834, now also don't allow modification.
- Integration test added.
- Unit test modified.
- Moves to a fork of gitea.com/go-chi/session that removed support for
couchbase (and ledis, but that was never made available in Forgejo)
along with other code improvements.
f8ce677595..main
- The rationale for removing Couchbase is quite simple. Its not licensed
under FOSS
license (https://www.couchbase.com/blog/couchbase-adopts-bsl-license/)
and therefore cannot be tested by Forgejo and shouldn't be supported.
This is a similair vein to the removal of MSSQL
support (https://codeberg.org/forgejo/discussions/issues/122)
- A additional benefit is that this reduces the Forgejo binary by ~600Kb.
This commit adds a new flag, `--keep-labels`, to the runner registration CLI command. If this flag is present and the runner being registered already exists, it will prevent the runners' labels from being reset.
In order to accomplish this, the signature of the `RegisterRunner` function from the `models/actions` package has been modified so that the labels argument can be nil. If it is, the part of the function that updates the record will not change the runner.
Various tests have been added for this function, for the following cases: new runner with labels, new runner without label, existing runner with labels, existing runner without labels.
The flag has been added to the CLI command, the action function has been updated to read the labels parameters through a separate function (`getLabels`), and test cases for this function have been added.
<!--
Before submitting a PR, please read the contributing guidelines:
https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/CONTRIBUTING.md
-->
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/4610
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Emmanuel BENOÎT <tseeker@nocternity.net>
Co-committed-by: Emmanuel BENOÎT <tseeker@nocternity.net>
If a repository has
git config --add push.pushOption submit=".sourcehut/*.yml"
it failed when pushed because of the unknown submit push
option. It will be ignored instead.
Filtering out the push options is done in an earlier stage, when the
hook command runs, before it submits the options map to the private
endpoint.
* move all the push options logic to modules/git/pushoptions
* add 100% test coverage for modules/git/pushoptions
Test coverage for the code paths from which code was moved to the
modules/git/pushoptions package:
* cmd/hook.go:runHookPreReceive
* routers/private/hook_pre_receive.go:validatePushOptions
tests/integration/git_push_test.go:TestOptionsGitPush runs through
both. The test verifying the option is rejected was removed and, if
added again, will fail because the option is now ignored instead of
being rejected.
* cmd/hook.go:runHookProcReceive
* services/agit/agit.go:ProcReceive
tests/integration/git_test.go: doCreateAgitFlowPull runs through
both. It uses variations of AGit related push options.
* cmd/hook.go:runHookPostReceive
* routers/private/hook_post_receive.go:HookPostReceive
tests/integration/git_test.go:doPushCreate called by TestGit/HTTP/sha1/PushCreate
runs through both.
Note that although it provides coverage for this code path it does not use push options.
Fixes: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/3651
cmd/dump.go uses os.Readdir to list the directory.
This is fine on its own, but TestAddRecursiveExclude in cmd/dump_test.go
depends on the order of the directory listing, which is where the issue
lays.
Directory listings using os.Readdir (lstat) don't actually guarantee an
order. They can differ due to a number of factors. Most notably the OS,
file system and settings.
As such, the test should not check the /order of the files/ added to the
archive, but instead simply check whether the archive /contains/ them.
So this is precisely what this commit does.
Note that only TestAddRecursiveExclude/File_inside_directory/No_exclude
has been observed to fail due to this, but all TestAddRecursiveExclude
subtests have been updated for consistency.
Also convert a comment into a warning in the logs when the deletion of
an artifact cannot find the file in the destination storage.
The case were an error happens while deleting the file is not covered
as it would require to mock the storage.Copy function.
Change the copy to use `ActionsArtifact.StoragePath` instead of the
`ArtifactPath`. Skip artifacts that are expired, and don't error if the
file to copy does not exist.
---
When trying to migrate actions artifact storage from local to MinIO, we
encountered errors that prevented the process from completing
successfully:
* The migration tries to copy the files using the per-run
`ArtifactPath`, instead of the unique `StoragePath`.
* Artifacts that have been marked expired and had their files deleted
would throw an error
* Artifacts that are pending, but don't have a file uploaded yet will
throw an error.
This PR addresses these cases, and allow the process to complete
successfully.
(cherry picked from commit 8de8972baf5d82ff7b58ed77d78e8e1869e64eb5)
Merging PR may fail because of various problems. The pull request may
have a dirty state because there is no transaction when merging a pull
request. ref
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/25741#issuecomment-2074126393
This PR moves all database update operations to post-receive handler for
merging a pull request and having a database transaction. That means if
database operations fail, then the git merging will fail, the git client
will get a fail result.
There are already many tests for pull request merging, so we don't need
to add a new one.
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit ebf0c969403d91ed80745ff5bd7dfbdb08174fc7)
Conflicts:
modules/private/hook.go
routers/private/hook_post_receive.go
trivial conflicts because
263a716cb5 * Performance optimization for git push (#30104)
was not cherry-picked and because of
998a431747 Do not update PRs based on events that happened before they existed
Noteable additions:
- `redefines-builtin-id` forbid variable names that shadow go builtins
- `empty-lines` remove unnecessary empty lines that `gofumpt` does not
remove for some reason
- `superfluous-else` eliminate more superfluous `else` branches
Rules are also sorted alphabetically and I cleaned up various parts of
`.golangci.yml`.
(cherry picked from commit 74f0c84fa4245a20ce6fb87dac1faf2aeeded2a2)
Conflicts:
.golangci.yml
apply the linter recommendations to Forgejo code as well
