This implements support for uploading files into the annex using the web
interface.
If a repository is a git-annex-enabled repository all files will be
added to it using git annex add. This means that the repository's
configuration for what to put into the annex (annex.largefiles in
gitattributes) will be respected.
Plain git repositories without git-annex will work as before, directly
uploading to git.
Fixes#5.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/matrss/forgejo-aneksajo/pulls/21
Co-authored-by: Matthias Riße <m.risse@fz-juelich.de>
Co-committed-by: Matthias Riße <m.risse@fz-juelich.de>
This updates the repo index/file view endpoints so annex files match the way
LFS files are rendered, making annexed files accessible via the web instead of
being black boxes only accessible by git clone.
This mostly just duplicates the existing LFS logic. It doesn't try to combine itself
with the existing logic, to make merging with upstream easier. If upstream ever
decides to accept, I would like to try to merge the redundant logic.
The one bit that doesn't directly copy LFS is my choice to hide annex-symlinks.
LFS files are always _pointer files_ and therefore always render with the "file"
icon and no special label, but annex files come in two flavours: symlinks or
pointer files. I've conflated both kinds to try to give a consistent experience.
The tests in here ensure the correct download link (/media, from the last PR)
renders in both the toolbar and, if a binary file (like most annexed files will be),
in the main pane, but it also adds quite a bit of code to make sure text files
that happen to be annexed are dug out and rendered inline like LFS files are.
Previously, Gitea's LFS support allowed direct-downloads of LFS content,
via http://$HOSTNAME:$PORT/$USER/$REPO/media/branch/$BRANCH/$FILE
Expand that grace to git-annex too. Now /media should provide the
relevant *content* from the .git/annex/objects/ folder.
This adds tests too. And expands the tests to try symlink-based annexing,
since /media implicitly supports both that and pointer-file-based annexing.
The git repository must be closed after using it. Without this change
some tests started to fail due to the lingering repository running into
a timeout.
This moves the `annexObjectPath()` helper out of the tests and into a
dedicated sub-package as `annex.ContentLocation()`, and expands it with
`.Pointer()` (which validates using `git annex examinekey`),
`.IsAnnexed()` and `.Content()` to make it a more useful module.
The tests retain their own wrapper version of `ContentLocation()`
because I tried to follow close to the API modules/lfs uses, which in
terms of abstract `git.Blob` and `git.TreeEntry` objects, not in terms
of `repoPath string`s which are more convenient for the tests.
This makes HTTP symmetric with SSH clone URLs.
This gives us the fancy feature of _anonymous_ downloads,
so people can access datasets without having to set up an
account or manage ssh keys.
Previously, to access "open access" data shared this way,
users would need to:
1. Create an account on gitea.example.com
2. Create ssh keys
3. Upload ssh keys (and make sure to find and upload the correct file)
4. `git clone git@gitea.example.com:user/dataset.git`
5. `cd dataset`
6. `git annex get`
This cuts that down to just the last three steps:
1. `git clone https://gitea.example.com/user/dataset.git`
2. `cd dataset`
3. `git annex get`
This is significantly simpler for downstream users, especially for those
unfamiliar with the command line.
Unfortunately there's no uploading. While git-annex supports uploading
over HTTP to S3 and some other special remotes, it seems to fail on a
_plain_ HTTP remote. See https://github.com/neuropoly/gitea/issues/7
and https://git-annex.branchable.com/forum/HTTP_uploads/#comment-ce28adc128fdefe4c4c49628174d9b92.
This is not a major loss since no one wants uploading to be anonymous anyway.
To support private repos, I had to hunt down and patch a secret extra security
corner that Gitea only applies to HTTP for some reason (services/auth/basic.go).
This was guided by https://git-annex.branchable.com/tips/setup_a_public_repository_on_a_web_site/
Fixes https://github.com/neuropoly/gitea/issues/3
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Guay-Paquet <mathieu.guaypaquet@polymtl.ca>
Fixes https://github.com/neuropoly/gitea/issues/11
Tests:
* `git annex init`
* `git annex copy --from origin`
* `git annex copy --to origin`
over:
* ssh
for:
* the owner
* a collaborator
* a read-only collaborator
* a stranger
in a
* public repo
* private repo
And then confirms:
* Deletion of the remote repo (to ensure lockdown isn't messing with us: https://git-annex.branchable.com/internals/lockdown/#comment-0cc5225dc5abe8eddeb843bfd2fdc382)
------
To support all this:
* Add util.FileCmp()
* Patch withKeyFile() so it can be nested in other copies of itself
-------
Many thanks to Mathieu for giving style tips and catching several bugs,
including a subtle one in util.filecmp() which neutered it.
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Guay-Paquet <mathieu.guay-paquet@polymtl.ca>
The PATCH if issue & pull request switched to use the service
functions instead. However, the service function changing the state is
not idempotent. Instead of doing nothing which changing from open to
open or close to close, it will fail with an error like:
Issue [2472] 0 was already closed
Regression of: 6a4bc0289d
Fixes: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/4686
(cherry picked from commit e9e3b8c0f3)
**Backport: #4638**
This PR reserves the devtest username. This is because /devtest is used
for testing various elements and layouts of the UI, and creating a user
or organisation with that name may cause problems and conflicts if the
RUN_MODE is set to dev
- Fixes a panic where the file history router would panic if the page
number was set to a page where no commits would be returned. It now
returns a 404 in such case.
- Regresion of a5b1c1b0b3
- Panic log provided by @algernon.
- Minimal integration test added.
Co-authored-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
(cherry picked from commit 6a49e3f468)
The `/repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/comments/{id}` API endpoint returns an
`assets` field, but the route handler did not load attachments, thus,
the field was never populated.
This patch fixes that, and adds a test to exercise it. The test fails
without the fix.
This addresses a bug discovered in Codeberg/Community#1607.
Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
(cherry picked from commit fc4f914e71)
- Don't show the labels-list element, if no labels are selected.
- The labels-list was taking up vertical space, even if no labels were
selected which caused an inconsistency in how the sidebar looked.
- Adds integration test
(cherry picked from commit 013b89eb13)
- The param wasn't `sha`, it was `ref`. Use this instead.
- Adds new integration tests.
- Resolves#4190
- Resolves#4025
(cherry picked from commit a8460bb132)
If a repository has
git config --add push.pushOption submit=".sourcehut/*.yml"
it failed when pushed because of the unknown submit push
option. It will be ignored instead.
Filtering out the push options is done in an earlier stage, when the
hook command runs, before it submits the options map to the private
endpoint.
* move all the push options logic to modules/git/pushoptions
* add 100% test coverage for modules/git/pushoptions
Test coverage for the code paths from which code was moved to the
modules/git/pushoptions package:
* cmd/hook.go:runHookPreReceive
* routers/private/hook_pre_receive.go:validatePushOptions
tests/integration/git_push_test.go:TestOptionsGitPush runs through
both. The test verifying the option is rejected was removed and, if
added again, will fail because the option is now ignored instead of
being rejected.
* cmd/hook.go:runHookProcReceive
* services/agit/agit.go:ProcReceive
tests/integration/git_test.go: doCreateAgitFlowPull runs through
both. It uses variations of AGit related push options.
* cmd/hook.go:runHookPostReceive
* routers/private/hook_post_receive.go:HookPostReceive
tests/integration/git_test.go:doPushCreate called by TestGit/HTTP/sha1/PushCreate
runs through both.
Note that although it provides coverage for this code path it does not use push options.
Fixes: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/3651
(cherry picked from commit 5561e80b04)
#3654 introduced support for searching non-default branches and tags.
However, the results page lacked any indicator (aside from the url) on which branch/tag the searcg was performed. A branch dropdown was introduced to the code search page when git-grep is used both as an indicator and as a intrusive way to switch between branches/tags.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/4262
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Shiny Nematoda <snematoda.751k2@aleeas.com>
Co-committed-by: Shiny Nematoda <snematoda.751k2@aleeas.com>
Closes#2797
I'm aware of https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/28163 exists, but since I had it laying around on my drive and collecting dust, I might as well open a PR for it if anyone wants the feature a bit sooner than waiting for upstream to release it or to be a forgejo "native" implementation.
This PR Contains:
- Support for the `workflow_dispatch` trigger
- Inputs: boolean, string, number, choice
Things still to be done:
- [x] API Endpoint `/api/v1/<org>/<repo>/actions/workflows/<workflow id>/dispatches`
- ~~Fixing some UI bugs I had no time figuring out, like why dropdown/choice inputs's menu's behave weirdly~~ Unrelated visual bug with dropdowns inside dropdowns
- [x] Fix bug where opening the branch selection submits the form
- [x] Limit on inputs to render/process
Things not in this PR:
- Inputs: environment (First need support for environments in forgejo)
Things needed to test this:
- A patch for https://code.forgejo.org/forgejo/runner to actually consider the inputs inside the workflow.
~~One possible patch can be seen here: https://code.forgejo.org/Mai-Lapyst/runner/src/branch/support-workflow-inputs~~
[PR](https://code.forgejo.org/forgejo/runner/pulls/199)
## Testing
- Checkout PR
- Setup new development runner with [this PR](https://code.forgejo.org/forgejo/runner/pulls/199)
- Create a repo with a workflow (see below)
- Go to the actions tab, select the workflow and see the notice as in the screenshot above
- Use the button + dropdown to run the workflow
- Try also running it via the api using the `` endpoint
- ...
- Profit!
<details>
<summary>Example workflow</summary>
```yaml
on:
workflow_dispatch:
inputs:
logLevel:
description: 'Log Level'
required: true
default: 'warning'
type: choice
options:
- info
- warning
- debug
tags:
description: 'Test scenario tags'
required: false
type: boolean
boolean_default_true:
description: 'Test scenario tags'
required: true
type: boolean
default: true
boolean_default_false:
description: 'Test scenario tags'
required: false
type: boolean
default: false
number1_default:
description: 'Number w. default'
default: '100'
type: number
number2:
description: 'Number w/o. default'
type: number
string1_default:
description: 'String w. default'
default: 'Hello world'
type: string
string2:
description: 'String w/o. default'
required: true
type: string
jobs:
test:
runs-on: docker
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v3
- run: whoami
- run: cat /etc/issue
- run: uname -a
- run: date
- run: echo ${{ inputs.logLevel }}
- run: echo ${{ inputs.tags }}
- env:
GITHUB_CONTEXT: ${{ toJson(github) }}
run: echo "$GITHUB_CONTEXT"
- run: echo "abc"
```
</details>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/3334
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Mai-Lapyst <mai-lapyst@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: Mai-Lapyst <mai-lapyst@noreply.codeberg.org>
There are a few changes of template logic which defines when which elements should be shown on profile page. The motivation is to have the elements when needed and don't when they're not relevant.
## Changes
### RSS button
Now displayed if:
* feeds are enabled
AND one or more of:
* the current user is an admin
* the current user is viewing their profile
* the activity is publicly available
So, basically in cases when the .rss feed actually contains any events. Before this change this button was constantly shown and was giving an empty feed if it was unavailable.
### Public activity tab
The tab is displayed if:
* the current user is an admin
* the current user is viewing their profile
* the activity is publicly available
* the current tab is this exact tab, for example, in case it was accessed by adding `?tab=activity` to the URL, so that the UI is not broken w/o a highlighted tab
So, this tab is not displayed when it's not going to contain any information, but still can be accessed.
### Banner "This user has disabled the public visibility of the activity."
For admins:
* always show the big blue banner to warn that sharing a screenshot of this publicly is bad idea
For self:
* always display a little note about the current visibility status with a "Change" link
For others:
* only display a little note to explain why the activity is not shown
### Heatmap and activity feed
Elements are only displayed when relevant, instead of keeping empty leftovers, for easier testing. This template change is also covered by test. **Everything in this Changes section is covered by test unless I forgot something.**
## Preview
There's obviously too many states to screenshot, here are highlights:
_Warning admin for why they're seeing the information_
_Viewing self - private_
_Viewing self - public_
_Don't have access to the information_
_The tab is not shown when the activity can't be accessed_
_Can't access the RSS feed_
_Can access the RSS feed_
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/4189
Reviewed-by: Otto <otto@codeberg.org>
This PR contains the following updates:
| Package | Type | Update | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| code.forgejo.org/f3/gof3/v3 | require | minor | `v3.3.1` -> `v3.4.0` |
---
### Configuration
📅 **Schedule**: Branch creation - "before 4am" (UTC), Automerge - "before 4am" (UTC).
🚦 **Automerge**: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.
♻ **Rebasing**: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.
🔕 **Ignore**: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.
---
- [ ] <!-- rebase-check -->If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box
---
This PR has been generated by [Renovate Bot](https://github.com/renovatebot/renovate).
<!--renovate-debug:eyJjcmVhdGVkSW5WZXIiOiIzNy40MDkuMSIsInVwZGF0ZWRJblZlciI6IjM3LjQwOS4xIiwidGFyZ2V0QnJhbmNoIjoiZm9yZ2VqbyIsImxhYmVscyI6WyJkZXBlbmRlbmN5LXVwZ3JhZGUiXX0=-->
Co-authored-by: Twenty Panda <twenty-panda@posteo.com>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/4196
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Renovate Bot <forgejo-renovate-action@forgejo.org>
Co-committed-by: Renovate Bot <forgejo-renovate-action@forgejo.org>
Ports fuzzy search for `/issues` and `/pulls` from gitea.
Adds fuzzy search for `/user/repo/issues` and `/user/repo/pulls`.
---
## Notes
### Port: [`gitea#be5be0ac81`](be5be0ac81)
- CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in routers/web/user/home.go
Conflict resolved by
1. keeping both `PageIsOrgIssues` and the newly introduced `IsFuzzy`
2. using `pager.AddParam(ctx, "fuzzy", "IsFuzzy")` rather than `pager.AddParamString("fuzzy", fmt.Sprintf("%v", isFuzzy))`
- CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in templates/user/dashboard/issues.tmpl
Conflict resolved by keeping the changes from #4096, and picking the `&fuzzy=${{.IsFuzzy}}` inclusion to all urls and `{{if .PageIsPulls}}...`
### Port: [`gitea#fede3cbada`](fede3cbada)
- CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in templates/user/dashboard/issues.tmpl
Conflict resolved by keeping previous changes and picking the replacement of `{{if .PageIsPulls}}...` with `{{template "shared/search/combo_fuzzy"...` which contains the replacement of `explorer.go` to `explorer.go_to`
### Fixup commit
replaces `Iif` with `if` which was introduced in gitea#fede3cbada
### Feature commit
adds in support for /user/repo/(issues|pulls) + test
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: Kerwin Bryant <kerwin612@qq.com>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/4160
Reviewed-by: twenty-panda <twenty-panda@noreply.codeberg.org>
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Shiny Nematoda <snematoda.751k2@aleeas.com>
Co-committed-by: Shiny Nematoda <snematoda.751k2@aleeas.com>
This adds org-mode readmes to the extensions that are prioritized when
searching for readme. Org-mode readmes come after markdown readmes in
terms of priority and before txt readmes.
Closes#4073
closes#3855
unlike #3854, this implementation uses a generic details html tag and a bit of tailwind magic...
---
## Maintainers Note
- previously tailwind classes of the form `[-a-zA-Z:0-9_.]` was disabled, however they were enabled since they were required for the `group-open:` classes
---
## Manual Testing
1. Visit the code search results after submitting a valid query for repo (if indexer disabled) or repo, user, explore (if indexer enabled)
2. Verify thst
1. the results are unfloded/open by default
2. the chevron points down when open and right when closed
<video src="/attachments/5a55c56f-6159-4422-ab80-962e0121e7d2" title="fold2.mp4" controls></video>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/4134
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Reviewed-by: Beowulf <beowulf@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Shiny Nematoda <snematoda.751k2@aleeas.com>
Co-committed-by: Shiny Nematoda <snematoda.751k2@aleeas.com>
* disabled the button itself, but added the tooltip to the form, because it didn't work for the button and likely has something to do with JS
* added an integration test to verify the new logic
## Preview
|Signed in|Guest|
|-|-|
|||
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/4095
Reviewed-by: Mai-Lapyst <mai-lapyst@noreply.codeberg.org>
Adds a feature similar to this https://github.blog/changelog/2021-11-24-specify-theme-context-for-images-in-markdown/ , by adding styles to elements which `src` or `href` attribute ends with `#light-mode-only` or `#dark-mode-only`. To improve compability, the github variants with the `gh-` prefix are also contained.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/3985
Reviewed-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Mai-Lapyst <mai-lapyst@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: Mai-Lapyst <mai-lapyst@noreply.codeberg.org>
