Refactor the setting to make unit test easier (#22405)

Some bugs caused by less unit tests in fundamental packages. This PR
refactor `setting` package so that create a unit test will be easier
than before.

- All `LoadFromXXX` files has been splited as two functions, one is
`InitProviderFromXXX` and `LoadCommonSettings`. The first functions will
only include the code to create or new a ini file. The second function
will load common settings.
- It also renames all functions in setting from `newXXXService` to
`loadXXXSetting` or `loadXXXFrom` to make the function name less
confusing.
- Move `XORMLog` to `SQLLog` because it's a better name for that.

Maybe we should finally move these `loadXXXSetting` into the `XXXInit`
function? Any idea?

---------

Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
This commit is contained in:
Lunny Xiao 2023-02-20 00:12:01 +08:00 committed by GitHub
parent 2b02343e21
commit c53ad052d8
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23
86 changed files with 1694 additions and 1464 deletions

View file

@ -41,12 +41,8 @@ var (
// NewContext loads custom highlight map from local config
func NewContext() {
once.Do(func() {
if setting.Cfg != nil {
keys := setting.Cfg.Section("highlight.mapping").Keys()
for i := range keys {
highlightMapping[keys[i].Name()] = keys[i].Value()
}
}
highlightMapping = setting.GetHighlightMapping()
// The size 512 is simply a conservative rule of thumb
c, err := lru.New2Q(512)
if err != nil {