Before:
After:
(TestOrg:test is a tag not branch)
Problem:
In the template, we will not add `compare pull` class when
`PageIsComparePull` is false.
a370efc13f/templates/repo/diff/compare.tmpl (L2)
But in the js, we are using `.repository.compare.pull` to find the
button:
a370efc13f/web_src/js/features/repo-legacy.js (L552-L563)
So, if `PageIsComparePull` is false, the `New Pull Request` button will
be there, but has no response when we click it.
- Refactor the form around the subscribe button into its own template
- Use htmx to perform the form submission
- `hx-boost="true"` to prevent the default form submission behavior of a
full page load
- `hx-sync="this:replace"` to replace the current request (in case the
button is clicked again before the response is returned)
- `hx-target="this"` to replace the form tag with the new form tag
- `hx-push-url="false"` to disable a change to the URL
- `hx-swap="show:no-scroll"` to preserve the scroll position
- Change the backend response to return a `<form>` tag instead of a
redirect to the issue page
- Include `htmx.org` in javascript imports
This change introduces htmx with the hope we could use it to make Gitea
more reactive while keeping our "HTML rendered on the server" approach.
# Before
# After
---------
Signed-off-by: Yarden Shoham <git@yardenshoham.com>
Currently only SHA1 repositories are supported by Gitea. This adds
support for alternate SHA256 with the additional aim of easier support
for additional hash types in the future.
Fixes: #13794
Limited by: https://github.com/go-git/go-git/issues/899
Depend on: #28138
<img width="776" alt="图片" src="5448c9a7-608e-4341-a149-5dd0069c9447">
---------
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
This is a little bugfix. Inline code is usually rendered in issue
titles, but it is missing in the activity tab.
Before:
After:
As more and more options can be set for creating the repository, I don't
think we should put all of them into the creation web page which will
make things look complicated and confusing.
And I think we need some rules about how to decide which should/should
not be put in creating a repository page. One rule I can imagine is if
this option can be changed later and it's not a MUST on the creation,
then it can be removed on the page. So I found trust model is the first
one.
This PR removed the trust model selections on creating a repository web
page and kept others as before.
This is also a preparation for #23894 which will add a choice about SHA1
or SHA256 that cannot be changed once the repository created.
If you view a file, you can now see the latest commit that changed that file.
---------
Co-authored-by: Denys Konovalov <kontakt@denyskon.de>
By clicking the currently active "Open" or "Closed" filter button in the
issue list, the user can toggle that filter off in order to see all
issues regardless of state. The URL "state" parameter will be set to
"all" and the "Open"/"Closed" button will not show as active.
Fixes#26548
This PR refactors the rendering of markup links. The old code uses
`strings.Replace` to change some urls while the new code uses more
context to decide which link should be generated.
The added tests should ensure the same output for the old and new
behaviour (besides the bug).
We may need to refactor the rendering a bit more to make it clear how
the different helper methods render the input string. There are lots of
options (resolve links / images / mentions / git hashes / emojis / ...)
but you don't really know what helper uses which options. For example,
we currently support images in the user description which should not be
allowed I think:
<details>
<summary>Profile</summary>
https://try.gitea.io/KN4CK3R
</details>
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Fixes#27114.
* In Gitea 1.12 (#9532), a "dismiss stale approvals" branch protection
setting was introduced, for ignoring stale reviews when verifying the
approval count of a pull request.
* In Gitea 1.14 (#12674), the "dismiss review" feature was added.
* This caused confusion with users (#25858), as "dismiss" now means 2
different things.
* In Gitea 1.20 (#25882), the behavior of the "dismiss stale approvals"
branch protection was modified to actually dismiss the stale review.
For some users this new behavior of dismissing the stale reviews is not
desirable.
So this PR reintroduces the old behavior as a new "ignore stale
approvals" branch protection setting.
---------
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
When JavaScript is not loaded, fall back to displaying reaction tooltips
with the default browser `title` attribute. An element with a present
but empty `data-tooltip-content` will use the `title` attribute for its
tippy.js tooltip content, so when JavaScript is enabled, this functions
the same as the current behavior.
Redesign repo header with following new aspects:
- responsive & better-looking repo title
- hide repo button text instead of icons in mobile view
- use same tab style as on explore and org page
<details>
<summary>Before:</summary>
</details>
<details>
<summary>After:</summary>
Since #20805, code can be hidden.
However, the related settings are still shown even though they don't
have any meaning then.
5fdee54d-ac81-418a-82f7-eadff048cedd
There is an accessibility issue in the interface when attempting to
delete a repository. When I click on "Delete repository," a dialog box
appears, requiring confirmation to proceed with the repository deletion.
However, when I press the "Repo name" label, the wrong input field gains
focus. The focused field is located behind the dialog and is intended
for renaming the repository.
- The RSS Feed icons were placed in a proper button, so that it does
not look "inconsistent". This also makes the problem of the button
being improperly aligned go away.
- The icon that shows on user profiles has not been modified because
of a lack of better implementation ideas.
- Where applicable, the RSS Feed icon was put directly next to the
Follow button (right menu), as both functionalities effectively
share the same purpose.
- Despite the attempt at achieving less inconsistency, a conscious
decision to not add any text to those buttons was made, opting for
tooltips instead. "Make it present, but not too annoying."
- A special exception was made for the Releases pages (which contains
text, not a tooltip), where an RSS feed would be particularly
beneficial to users.
The fact that the RSS functionality is explicitly optional was taken
into account, and these improvements were made with public-facing
instances (where the feature works best) in mind.
Fixes https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/1759
If you are bowing another branch than the default branch and click n the
Code tab, it will take you to the root of the branch. The `BranchName`
variable is also set when viewing a Wiki commit, so we also need to
check if we are on a Wiki.
Follow-up #22844close#28142
Before
After
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
1. Show diff stats only on large screens
these are already shown in tabs, so no need for this duplicate
information on small screens
2. Hide viewed files information on small screens
Github does the same and this gives us more free space on small screens
3. Review bar now doesn't wrap so we don't need the 77px even on very
small screens
(the sticky headers are still working)
In #25315, @denyskon fixed UI on mobile view.
But for the repo description, on desktop view there's no word-break.
So maybe we can just add `gt-word-break` to fix it on both mobile view
and desktop view.
Before:
desktop view:
mobile view:
After:
desktop view:
mobile view(almost same?)
---------
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
When an assignee changed event comment is rendered, most of it is
guarded behind the assignee ID not being 0. However, if it is 0, that
results in quite broken rendering for that comment and the next one.
This can happen, for example, when repository data imported from outside
of Gitea is incomplete.
This PR makes sure comments with an assignee ID of 0 are not rendered at
all.
---
Screenshot before:
<img width="272" alt="Bildschirmfoto 2023-11-05 um 20 12 18"
src="7d629d76-fee4-4fe5-9e3a-bf524050cead">
The comments in this screenshot are:
1. A regular text comment
2. A user being unassigned
3. A user being assigned
4. The title of the PR being changed
Comments 2 and 3 are rendered without any text, which indents the next
comment and does not leave enough vertical space.
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
Before:
desktop view:
mobile view:
after click `Save` btn:
refresh the page, you will see that `gt-m-0` is missing after save
topic:
After:
desktop view:
mobile view:
after click `Save` btn:
Remove the "tabindex" from some form buttons on the "diff box" / "issue view content" page, let the browser use the default tab order.
---------
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Step one for a GitHub like commit status check ui:
Step two:
The design now will list all commit status checks which takes too much
space.
This is a pre-improve for #26247
---------
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Currently this feature is only available to admins, but there is no
clear reason why. If a user can actually merge pull requests, then this
seems fine as well.
This is useful in situations where direct pushes to the repository are
commonly done by developers.
---------
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
