backport #28213
This PR will fix some missed checks for private repositories' data on
web routes and API routes.
(cherry picked from commit dfd511faf35fef68557e53763f9b06e5a139565d)
Backport of #27915Fixes#27819
We have support for two factor logins with the normal web login and with
basic auth. For basic auth the two factor check was implemented at three
different places and you need to know that this check is necessary. This
PR moves the check into the basic auth itself.
(cherry picked from commit 00705da102be929dfa41519b030be3bdd8c68472)
Backport #27721 by @lng2020
Fix#27711
Co-authored-by: Nanguan Lin <70063547+lng2020@users.noreply.github.com>
(cherry picked from commit 71803d33e395829e4b7cee2bd4ae078527106a48)
Backport #26392 by @wxiaoguang
Fix#26389
And complete an old TODO: `ctx.Params does un-escaping,..., which is
incorrect.`
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit 2d1a7e1cd42b31a62ca627423d088339809238c8)
- Follow up for: #540, #802
- Add API routes for user blocking from user and organization
perspective.
- The new routes have integration testing.
- The new model functions have unit tests.
- Actually quite boring to write and to read this pull request.
(cherry picked from commit f3afaf15c7e34038363c9ce8e1ef957ec1e22b06)
(cherry picked from commit 6d754db3e5faff93a58fab2867737f81f40f6599)
(cherry picked from commit d0fc8bc9d3b6bb189a2ab634a5329253af9b4629)
(cherry picked from commit 9a53b0d1a07455596622cb02716b476b6aaa95e4)
(cherry picked from commit 44a2a4fd48678058777d6db46c13a2c7298497d4)
(cherry picked from commit 182025db9cc76073bdb0221dfd1fb3b2b66f7fd4)
(cherry picked from commit 558a35963eddd672f1911393a649ab08a9283e5b)
- Resolves#476
- Follow up for: #540
- Ensure that the doer and blocked person cannot follow each other.
- Ensure that the block person cannot watch doer's repositories.
- Add unblock button to the blocked user list.
- Add blocked since information to the blocked user list.
- Add extra testing to moderation code.
- Blocked user will unwatch doer's owned repository upon blocking.
- Add flash messages to let the user know the block/unblock action was successful.
- Add "You haven't blocked any users" message.
- Add organization blocking a user.
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/802
(cherry picked from commit 0505a1042197bd9136b58bc70ec7400a23471585)
(cherry picked from commit 37b4e6ef9b85e97d651cf350c9f3ea272ee8d76a)
(cherry picked from commit 217475385a815298dcbd8029e0cc8cb2c5877bae)
(cherry picked from commit f2c38ce5c2f6cf4008aa1929539063715b50562c)
(cherry picked from commit 1edfb68137d8c322a7a9a7c7196fc8f01ff1a889)
(cherry picked from commit 2cbc12dc740e6fefc196b7fea6ac8a0ffbbfbeef)
(cherry picked from commit 79ff020f182327986dcfd874bc49d4fe32efc29a)
- Add the ability to block a user via their profile page.
- This will unstar their repositories and visa versa.
- Blocked users cannot create issues or pull requests on your the doer's repositories (mind that this is not the case for organizations).
- Blocked users cannot comment on the doer's opened issues or pull requests.
- Blocked users cannot add reactions to doer's comments.
- Blocked users cannot cause a notification trough mentioning the doer.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/540
(cherry picked from commit 687d852480388897db4d7b0cb397cf7135ab97b1)
(cherry picked from commit 0c32a4fde531018f74e01d9db6520895fcfa10cc)
(cherry picked from commit 1791130e3cb8470b9b39742e0004d5e4c7d1e64d)
(cherry picked from commit 00f411819f62c02016d46602ab4daf49effe0550)
(cherry picked from commit e0c039b0e899e787a8df1efdd6b47388d93e08fa)
(cherry picked from commit b5a058ef0039e95be23893e6fefdcb62a7de071a)
(cherry picked from commit 5ff5460d28a482526da7e77bffb18d08de14aaaa)
(cherry picked from commit 97bc6e619d2970839b8692b7b025ff0ec1c96d12)
(cherry picked from commit 7b0549cd70aa7cafec853e15b25270847c59850b)
(cherry picked from commit 13e10a65d974c7b594681bfa36402a6144862116)
(cherry picked from commit 65bdd73cf27895a9fb8db2a95ef4f5b08951481d)
(cherry picked from commit 64eba8bb923176b4c286b1d0c83792f3c3005ca8)
(cherry picked from commit 4c49b1a759abe3604afc1121e83c9a942016ad6a)
(cherry picked from commit 93b4d0640683ea986657453b1fce49a00c861764)
(cherry picked from commit e2bc5f36d958f4349160ec145719c302d4023cd0)
(cherry picked from commit 2bee76f9dfa998c83ea4fe648997fad0b6224fa9)
(cherry picked from commit 3d8a1b4a9fb9dc55bbd62fd8855ea85e58dc263f)
(cherry picked from commit 99dd092cd02d7af8374acf454833ce1c05fd4fd9)
(cherry picked from commit 0fdbd02204d533f907cd22c83c73bf0156ec4a88)
(cherry picked from commit 70b277a183c0d85966fa84e9b054f164ae2d2a44)
(cherry picked from commit 3eece7fbb4e67d970d8979d0d60a58ee2a195ea5)
(cherry picked from commit 4838fc9e1145a74c56926de68854234604b5e38f)
(cherry picked from commit b76ed541cf4d73702a83d6b96f8618b6f8c44393)
(cherry picked from commit b1141cb3a1a0c602020ddff2021448a056cb3232)
(cherry picked from commit 63f4f8a1cefe10ddc4a9a589e9ae2087b78ec3c6)
(cherry picked from commit 67245f5b440c20bbd7fc039747f6b386cee3fbed)
(cherry picked from commit 19f1633fa3dcf14275fd7fcb3bb549e20ef8f688)
(cherry picked from commit 51c9663b4a4150d8ea3bdf1ef1eb157ead30046c)
- Change the values for the nodeinfo API, to use branded values.
- Resolves https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/257
(cherry picked from commit 4608c57688d8b12dbc265dd21bfe7cd269efb116)
(cherry picked from commit e837e8a52943f803a40cd0151e24f7fe8edb11ec)
(cherry picked from commit 6601328d3ce9b57dbaa768dd2d41295293ff94f9)
(cherry picked from commit c6be21d4870e6b748a85f0da19bd4b717875b224)
(cherry picked from commit 5adc6ffee2e6f1af72039747df809aa6ebd2198f)
(cherry picked from commit 2ff8d166ac1e56ab7a349d70f875bd2ae9763418)
(cherry picked from commit b6a90e7e5af0e998cbbf1fc1edb901ae31090999)
(cherry picked from commit d1089e706cda009a6a23462adf498fd24a609b0a)
Conflicts:
tests/integration/api_nodeinfo_test.go
(cherry picked from commit 7a29df737d979abed4d37f084e3a92ee788d2c6e)
(cherry picked from commit 3655a30c60229167bc007e139d0461a5648741d5)
(cherry picked from commit c90d61141016ffbbaaa6b4f4657dacf5446f30c0)
(cherry picked from commit 0274bd8860bd00de628fba990e42bf7385ddf5b9)
(cherry picked from commit fdb786b71decd1c968f7c473c94463140f192fc3)
(cherry picked from commit 4f08f100a19886210b89d1cacfd09e6db0e48fb7)
(cherry picked from commit 56a27118227521fae93e052bb77265fb10c6dcf8)
(cherry picked from commit 3b2cfa452df0d2651a75c5e3fcd442c38acff109)
(cherry picked from commit 773ddcf956a897bbaa75aff3087f8a64b254239c)
(cherry picked from commit b3c12e6bccb4ea65f7fa1ab38abaa313013aac9d)
(cherry picked from commit 1315177082a6b32cb04719124d76105ed656d09f)
(cherry picked from commit 3f1007795ce769ce16f2c74454ad4459723378cf)
(cherry picked from commit 352bda0147a02c81f1a59412a0ab9f34993cb127)
(cherry picked from commit 3d8c153ded7547f2343d0da6051b296c9265f286)
Backport #25476 by @GeorgDangl
In the process of doing a bit of automation via the API, we've
discovered a _small_ issue in the Swagger definition. We tried to create
a push mirror for a repository, but our generated client raised an
exception due to an unexpected status code.
When looking at this function:
3c7f5ed7b5/routers/api/v1/repo/mirror.go (L236-L240)
We see it defines `201 - Created` as response:
3c7f5ed7b5/routers/api/v1/repo/mirror.go (L260-L262)
But it actually returns `200 - OK`:
3c7f5ed7b5/routers/api/v1/repo/mirror.go (L373)
So I've just updated the Swagger definitions to match the code😀
Co-authored-by: Georg Dangl <10274404+GeorgDangl@users.noreply.github.com>
Backport #25548 by @Zettat123
This PR
- fixes#25545
- fixes two incorrect `reqToken()` in `/notifications` endpoints (caused
by #24767)
Co-authored-by: Zettat123 <zettat123@gmail.com>
Backport #23911 by @lunny
Follow up #22405Fix#20703
This PR rewrites storage configuration read sequences with some breaks
and tests. It becomes more strict than before and also fixed some
inherit problems.
- Move storage's MinioConfig struct into setting, so after the
configuration loading, the values will be stored into the struct but not
still on some section.
- All storages configurations should be stored on one section,
configuration items cannot be overrided by multiple sections. The
prioioty of configuration is `[attachment]` > `[storage.attachments]` |
`[storage.customized]` > `[storage]` > `default`
- For extra override configuration items, currently are `SERVE_DIRECT`,
`MINIO_BASE_PATH`, `MINIO_BUCKET`, which could be configured in another
section. The prioioty of the override configuration is `[attachment]` >
`[storage.attachments]` > `default`.
- Add more tests for storages configurations.
- Update the storage documentations.
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Fixes some issues with the swagger documentation for the new multiple
files API endpoint (#24887) which were overlooked when submitting the
original PR:
1. add some missing parameter descriptions
2. set correct `required` option for required parameters
3. change endpoint description to match it full functionality (every
kind of file modification is supported, not just creating and updating)
## Changes
- Adds the following high level access scopes, each with `read` and
`write` levels:
- `activitypub`
- `admin` (hidden if user is not a site admin)
- `misc`
- `notification`
- `organization`
- `package`
- `issue`
- `repository`
- `user`
- Adds new middleware function `tokenRequiresScopes()` in addition to
`reqToken()`
- `tokenRequiresScopes()` is used for each high-level api section
- _if_ a scoped token is present, checks that the required scope is
included based on the section and HTTP method
- `reqToken()` is used for individual routes
- checks that required authentication is present (but does not check
scope levels as this will already have been handled by
`tokenRequiresScopes()`
- Adds migration to convert old scoped access tokens to the new set of
scopes
- Updates the user interface for scope selection
### User interface example
<img width="903" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 55 PM"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/654766ec-2143-4f59-9037-3b51600e32f3">
<img width="917" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 43 PM"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/1ad64081-012c-4a73-b393-66b30352654c">
## tokenRequiresScopes Design Decision
- `tokenRequiresScopes()` was added to more reliably cover api routes.
For an incoming request, this function uses the given scope category
(say `AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization`) and the HTTP method (say
`DELETE`) and verifies that any scoped tokens in use include
`delete:organization`.
- `reqToken()` is used to enforce auth for individual routes that
require it. If a scoped token is not present for a request,
`tokenRequiresScopes()` will not return an error
## TODO
- [x] Alphabetize scope categories
- [x] Change 'public repos only' to a radio button (private vs public).
Also expand this to organizations
- [X] Disable token creation if no scopes selected. Alternatively, show
warning
- [x] `reqToken()` is missing from many `POST/DELETE` routes in the api.
`tokenRequiresScopes()` only checks that a given token has the correct
scope, `reqToken()` must be used to check that a token (or some other
auth) is present.
- _This should be addressed in this PR_
- [x] The migration should be reviewed very carefully in order to
minimize access changes to existing user tokens.
- _This should be addressed in this PR_
- [x] Link to api to swagger documentation, clarify what
read/write/delete levels correspond to
- [x] Review cases where more than one scope is needed as this directly
deviates from the api definition.
- _This should be addressed in this PR_
- For example:
```go
m.Group("/users/{username}/orgs", func() {
m.Get("", reqToken(), org.ListUserOrgs)
m.Get("/{org}/permissions", reqToken(), org.GetUserOrgsPermissions)
}, tokenRequiresScopes(auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryUser,
auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization),
context_service.UserAssignmentAPI())
```
## Future improvements
- [ ] Add required scopes to swagger documentation
- [ ] Redesign `reqToken()` to be opt-out rather than opt-in
- [ ] Subdivide scopes like `repository`
- [ ] Once a token is created, if it has no scopes, we should display
text instead of an empty bullet point
- [ ] If the 'public repos only' option is selected, should read
categories be selected by default
Closes#24501Closes#24799
Co-authored-by: Jonathan Tran <jon@allspice.io>
Co-authored-by: Kyle D <kdumontnu@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
This addressees some things from #24406 that came up after the PR was
merged. Mostly from @delvh.
---------
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
This PR creates an API endpoint for creating/updating/deleting multiple
files in one API call similar to the solution provided by
[GitLab](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/api/commits.html#create-a-commit-with-multiple-files-and-actions).
To archive this, the CreateOrUpdateRepoFile and DeleteRepoFIle functions
in files service are unified into one function supporting multiple files
and actions.
Resolves#14619
This adds the ability to pin important Issues and Pull Requests. You can
also move pinned Issues around to change their Position. Resolves#2175.
## Screenshots
The Design was mostly copied from the Projects Board.
## Implementation
This uses a new `pin_order` Column in the `issue` table. If the value is
set to 0, the Issue is not pinned. If it's set to a bigger value, the
value is the Position. 1 means it's the first pinned Issue, 2 means it's
the second one etc. This is dived into Issues and Pull requests for each
Repo.
## TODO
- [x] You can currently pin as many Issues as you want. Maybe we should
add a Limit, which is configurable. GitHub uses 3, but I prefer 6, as
this is better for bigger Projects, but I'm open for suggestions.
- [x] Pin and Unpin events need to be added to the Issue history.
- [x] Tests
- [x] Migration
**The feature itself is currently fully working, so tester who may find
weird edge cases are very welcome!**
---------
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
close https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/16321
Provided a webhook trigger for requesting someone to review the Pull
Request.
Some modifications have been made to the returned `PullRequestPayload`
based on the GitHub webhook settings, including:
- add a description of the current reviewer object as
`RequestedReviewer` .
- setting the action to either **review_requested** or
**review_request_removed** based on the operation.
- adding the `RequestedReviewers` field to the issues_model.PullRequest.
This field will be loaded into the PullRequest through
`LoadRequestedReviewers()` when `ToAPIPullRequest` is called.
After the Pull Request is merged, I will supplement the relevant
documentation.
