- Backport of #2696
- Add `form-fetch-action` to indicate that this form POST to an link
that returns JSON and thus should be handled by Javascript code.
- Found by @fnetx
- Regression of https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1793
(cherry picked from commit 9551c1a6f8)
Backport #29537 by wxiaoguang
This is only a quick fix to make it easier to backport.
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit 971eab18fa0b29312105df739fba443cf9e84d50)
- It's possible for reviews to not be assiocated with users, when they
were migrated from another forge instance. In the migration code,
there's no sanitization check for author names, so they could contain
HTML tags and thus needs to be properely escaped.
- Pass `$reviewerName` trough `Escape`.
Backport #29257Fix#29233
The delete button of time logs won't be shown when the time tracker is
disabled.
Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me>
(cherry picked from commit e940443b276fa4f30633902f025fd2adad1b22de)
Follow-up of #2282 and #2296 (which tried to address #2278)
One of the issue with the previous PR is that when a conversation on the Files tab was marked as "resolved", it would fetch all the comments for that line (even the outdated ones, which should not be shown on this page - except when explicitly activated).
To properly fix this, I have changed `FetchCodeCommentsByLine` to `FetchCodeConversation`. Its role is to fetch all comments related to a given (review, path, line) and reverted my changes in the template (which were based on a misunderstanding).
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/2306
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: oliverpool <git@olivier.pfad.fr>
Co-committed-by: oliverpool <git@olivier.pfad.fr>
Backport #26745Fixes#26548
This PR refactors the rendering of markup links. The old code uses
`strings.Replace` to change some urls while the new code uses more
context to decide which link should be generated.
The added tests should ensure the same output for the old and new
behaviour (besides the bug).
We may need to refactor the rendering a bit more to make it clear how
the different helper methods render the input string. There are lots of
options (resolve links / images / mentions / git hashes / emojis / ...)
but you don't really know what helper uses which options. For example,
we currently support images in the user description which should not be
allowed I think:
<details>
<summary>Profile</summary>
https://try.gitea.io/KN4CK3R
</details>
(cherry picked from commit 022552d5b6adc792d3cd16df7de6e52cb7b41a72)
- Backport of #2100
- Make the reference URL in the "Reference in New issue" feature
absolute again as it wouldn't render as a link otherwise.
- Adds integration test.
- Regression by 769be877f2
- Resolves#2012
(cherry picked from commit c74bae28973092eeeaf2fb9a17cbe41d286648db)
Backport #28351 by @KN4CK3R
Fix#28347
As there is no info how to reproduce it, I can't test it.
Fix may be `section_split.tmpl @ 126/130`.
Other changes are "empty check" refactorings.
Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me>
(cherry picked from commit 08445d5d863e23d2e540d44ace030da0bd474bbf)
- The review type '22' is a general comment type that is attached to
single codecomments, reviews with multiple comments or to simple approve
and request changes comment. This comment can be used to create a link
towards this action on an pull request.
- Adds an anchor to the review comment type, so that when its getting
linked to it, it actually jumps towards that event.
- This also now fixes the behavior that after you created a review you
will be redirected to that review and because this is an general comment
type other mails will also be 'fixed' such as the approved or request
changes.
- Resolves https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/1248
(cherry picked from commit 1741a5f1fe6adc68bb5f87bdd1c5bdc5bfaa45c7)
---------
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Co-authored-by: Caesar Schinas <caesar@caesarschinas.com>
(cherry picked from commit 89c9a498fd)
(cherry picked from commit a2e2ce79f4bf56e4a002b77f3ffbbf6cf739f469)
(cherry picked from commit 299e437379863b7b3a36b97862d3789a8be28c78)
(cherry picked from commit 91a224ce2d961930e41efb9695cef31b9afe0275)
(cherry picked from commit 3a89b23b3b1800dc2be466c2ffa6192a4edff2e1)
- Don't expect that rendering is done on a repository, use the given
issue to figure out the repository link.
- Resolves https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/1321
(cherry picked from commit 63f16652ca21809d2e088c46ddb88b84c08a5ad6)
(cherry picked from commit 821785d0af2fc2a41997675fc2809e1e45c0cdd8)
(cherry picked from commit 345742a0dc2b505a5bdc0747d4e2cda7136e735d)
(cherry picked from commit 2a37b91d7ced112b06d04950a9970cbd2d52f0f2)
(cherry picked from commit 9d40b409d715d336f68ec6306d8a928c171c85fc)
(cherry picked from commit c4c377e73312f36111d5f874195c9aebbb9c8635)
(cherry picked from commit 41f85e3bca361dbd1d58ea1573c9086ad82597b5)
(cherry picked from commit b5a2da8210a41e4ee8ab44a1d06893d66a70f906)
(cherry picked from commit 3a01437704a72a826c1bf3ce64fcd56303989ba4)
(cherry picked from commit a007f67f74fec914d9783f1b02b960a5dbbff26f)
Backport #27927 by @invliD
When an assignee changed event comment is rendered, most of it is
guarded behind the assignee ID not being 0. However, if it is 0, that
results in quite broken rendering for that comment and the next one.
This can happen, for example, when repository data imported from outside
of Gitea is incomplete.
This PR makes sure comments with an assignee ID of 0 are not rendered at
all.
---
Screenshot before:
<img width="272" alt="Bildschirmfoto 2023-11-05 um 20 12 18"
src="7d629d76-fee4-4fe5-9e3a-bf524050cead">
The comments in this screenshot are:
1. A regular text comment
2. A user being unassigned
3. A user being assigned
4. The title of the PR being changed
Comments 2 and 3 are rendered without any text, which indents the next
comment and does not leave enough vertical space.
Co-authored-by: Sebastian Brückner <code@nik.dev>
Backport #27892 by @earl-warren
- Remove the set tabindex and instead let the browser figure out the
correct tab order.
- Resolves https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/1626
Co-authored-by: Earl Warren <109468362+earl-warren@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Backport #27592 by @JakobDev
If you set a checkbox as required in a issue form at the moment, the
checkbox is checked and read only, what does not make much sense. With
this PR, the Checkbox actually needs to be checked. The label supports
now also Markdown. This matches GitHub's behaviour.
And yes, I know the CSS is a ugly workaround. It looks like the given
CSS code is part Fomantic and I don't know how to change that. The
Maintainers are free to change that.
Co-authored-by: JakobDev <jakobdev@gmx.de>
Backport #27115 by @puni9869
Followup https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/26820
## Archived labels UI for issue filter and issue filter actions for
issues/pull request pages.
Changed:
* Enhanced the Issue filter and Issue filter actions UI page to
seamlessly incorporate a list of archived labels.
* Pagination functionality is same as before. If archived label checkbox
is checked then we are adding a query string`archived=true` in the url
to save the state of page.
* Issue filter actions menu is separated into different template.
* Adding the archived flag in issue url labels.
* Pull Request page is also work the same.
Outsourced:
* Defer the implementation of specialized handling for archived labels
to upcoming pull requests. This step will be undertaken subsequent to
the successful merge of this pull request.
Screenshots
### Issue page
<img width="1360" alt="image"
src="d7efb2ef-5b2b-449d-83f0-d430a32ec432">
### Issue page with label filter on archived label checkbox when not
checked --> No archived label is there in list
<img width="1249" alt="image"
src="ceea68ef-91f2-4693-910f-2e25e236bfc9">
### Issue page with label filter on archived label checkbox when checked
--> Show archived label in the list.
<img width="710" alt="image"
src="2414d26b-2079-4c3c-bd9e-f2f5411bcabf">
### Issue page with label filter on issue action menu on archived label
checkbox when checked --> Show archived label in the list.
<img width="409" alt="image"
src="259cac87-3e21-4778-99a2-a6a0b8c81178">
### Applied the archived=true in Issue labels when archived checkbox is
checked.
<img width="984" alt="image"
src="657ce3db-c0ae-402e-b12d-3b580d3c2ed0">
---
Part of https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/25237
Signed-off-by: puni9869 <punitinani1@hotmail.com>
Co-authored-by: puni9869 <80308335+puni9869@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Backport #27265 by @JakobDev
Part of #27065
This PR touches functions used in templates. As templates are not static
typed, errors are harder to find, but I hope I catch it all. I think
some tests from other persons do not hurt.
Co-authored-by: JakobDev <jakobdev@gmx.de>
Backport #27227 by @denyskon
Throughout the Gitea codebase, you can meet some weird constructions to
make `locale.Tr` work in subtemplates.
Since we now have `ctx.Locale.Tr` which solves that problem, clean up
various templates which pass `locale` through `dict` or use some weird
constructions like `$.root.locale`
Going on, it would be great to replace every case of `$.locale.Tr` and
`.locale.Tr` with `ctx.Locale.Tr`, but that needs to be done with
patience.
Co-authored-by: Denys Konovalov <kontakt@denyskon.de>
Backport #27175 by @wxiaoguang
According to https://fomantic-ui.com/modules/dropdown.html and our
"devtest" page, many dropdown elements has incorrect "icon" position.
This PR fixes all of them. Fix#27173
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
I think it's better if the primary actions have primary color instead of
green which fits better into the overall single-color UI design. This PR
currently replaces every green button with primary:
<img width="141" alt="Screenshot 2023-09-16 at 14 07 59"
src="843c1e50-4fb2-4ec6-84ba-0efb9472dcbe">
<img width="161" alt="Screenshot 2023-09-16 at 14 07 51"
src="9442195a-a3b2-4a42-b262-8377d6f5c0d1">
Modal actions now use uncolored/primary instead of previous green/red
colors. I also removed the box-shadow on all basic buttons:
<img width="259" alt="Screenshot 2023-09-16 at 14 16 39"
src="5beea529-127a-44b0-8d4c-afa7b034a490">
<img width="261" alt="Screenshot 2023-09-16 at 14 17 42"
src="4757f7b2-4d46-49bc-a797-38bb28437b88">
The change currently includes the "Merge PR" button, for which we might
want to make an exception to match the icon color there:
<img width="442" alt="Screenshot 2023-09-16 at 14 33 53"
src="993ac1a5-c94d-4895-b76c-0d872181a70b">
Close#27012
By the way, rename the single-word ID to a long ID.
1. Use `gt-invisible` instead of `invisible`.
2. Use `gt-word-break` instead of `dont-break-out` (there is a slight
different "hyphens", but I think it won't affect too much since it is
only used for the "full name").
3. Remove `.small.button:has(svg)` , now our buttons could layout SVG
correctly, and actually I didn't see this CSS class is used in code.
Each change is tested manually line by line. There are too many changes
so I can't share dozens of screenshots.
In short:
1. `ui right` could be still used in `ui top attached header`, because
there is a special case.
2. A lot of `ui right` are just no-op, so they can be removed safely.
3. Some of the `ui right` should be replaced by `gt-float-right` (to
avoid breaking, leave them to the future).
4. A few of the `ui right` could be rewritten by flex.
Followup https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/26478
## Archived labels UI
Changed:
* Enhanced the Filtered UI page to seamlessly incorporate a list of
archived labels.
Outsourced:
* Defer the implementation of specialized handling for archived labels
to upcoming pull requests. This step will be undertaken subsequent to
the successful merge of this pull request.
Screenshots
---
Part of https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/25237
---------
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Fix#26731
Almost all "tabindex" in code are incorrect.
1. All "input/button" by default are focusable, so no need to use "tabindex=0"
2. All "div/span" by default are not focusable, so no need to use "tabindex=-1"
3. All "dropdown" are focusable by framework, so no need to use "tabindex"
4. Some tabindex values are incorrect (eg: `new_form.tmpl`), so remove them
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
Removed CSS helper classes (some of them are not useful while some of
them are abused often)
* `gt-db`: in most cases it could be replaced by `gt-df` and the flex
layout should be encouraged. Other cases: either it does need the
`gt-df` (eg: by using `div` directly) or it is an abuse (eg: the warning
message in a form)
* `gt-di`: it doesn't seem useful, or it could be replaced by `gt-dib`
in most cases.
* `gt-dif`: not useful, it could be replaced by `flex-text-inline` or
`gt-df`
* `gt-js`: never used
* All `<i class="icon gt-df gt-ac gt-jc">` could be written as `<i
class="icon">`
## Some UI samples
### Admin Notice
### Admin Stacktrace
### Org Home
### Org Team Repo
### Release List
### User Setting Application Token Scope
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/26567#issue-1855312074
> The terms `closest` and `furthest` don't describe the actual sorting
behavior as these two are semantically relative to the current date.
> Could we switch to `earliest` and `latest` instead?
close#26567
---------
Co-authored-by: yp05327 <576951401@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
## Archived labels
This adds the structure to allow for archived labels.
Archived labels are, just like closed milestones or projects, a medium to hide information without deleting it.
It is especially useful if there are outdated labels that should no longer be used without deleting the label entirely.
## Changes
1. UI and API have been equipped with the support to mark a label as archived
2. The time when a label has been archived will be stored in the DB
## Outsourced for the future
There's no special handling for archived labels at the moment.
This will be done in the future.
## Screenshots
Part of https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/25237
---------
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
This PR refactors a bunch of projects-related code, mostly the
templates.
The following things were done:
- rename boards to columns in frontend code
- use the new `ctx.Locale.Tr` method
- cleanup template, remove useless newlines, classes, comments
- merge org-/user and repo level project template together
- move "new column" button into project toolbar
- move issue card (shared by projects and pinned issues) to shared
template, remove useless duplicated styles
- add search function to projects (to make the layout more similar to
milestones list where it is inherited from 😆)
- maybe more changes I forgot I've done 😆Closes#24893
After:
---------
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
