Fix regression of https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8214 (regressing v11 feature https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/6523)
Reporeted by @Andre601.
## Preview
## Testing
* go to https://v13.next.forgejo.org/, log in
* create repo, add some issue labels (on `./labels`)
* create issue
* add some labels to it and then close it
* observe that what you see looks more like the 2nd screenshot than the 1st screenshot
<!--start release-notes-assistant-->
## Release notes
<!--URL:https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo-->
- Bug fixes
- [PR](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8644): <!--number 8644 --><!--line 0 --><!--description Zml4KHVpKTogdXBkYXRlIGkxOG4gdXNhZ2UgaW4gY29tbWVudHM=-->fix(ui): update i18n usage in comments<!--description-->
<!--end release-notes-assistant-->
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8644
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Wolff <mahlzahn@posteo.de>
Co-authored-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
- Follow up to forgejo/forgejo#8622
- Now the converse is also tested, a rebase should have happened and the commit IDs should differ.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8635
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Co-committed-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Use the new `forgejo` platform instead of the `gitea`
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8629
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Michael Kriese <michael.kriese@visualon.de>
Co-committed-by: Michael Kriese <michael.kriese@visualon.de>
- Do not try to rebase a pull request when it is zero commits behind. We can trust this number as before merging a repository the status of the pull request is mergeable and thus not in a conflict checking stage (where this would be updated).
- This resolves a issue where `git-replay` would rebase a pull request when this is not needed and causes to lose the signature of Git commits and commit IDs as shown in the pullrequest commits timeline.
- Resolvesforgejo/forgejo#8619
- Add a simple integration test that simply checks that after merging a up-to-date pull request via the rebase style that the commit ID didn't change. This demonstrates that it didn't do needlessly rebasing.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8622
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Co-committed-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
- Add links to review request targets in issue comments
- Fix links to ghost users/orgs/teams to be empty
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8239
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Robert Wolff <mahlzahn@posteo.de>
Co-committed-by: Robert Wolff <mahlzahn@posteo.de>
After seeing #8111 use a webcomponent, I think that they are a neat usecase for Forgejo where most of the frontend is backend-generated, with some "island of enhancements".
I am considering using a webcomponent for the CITATION management (last occurrence of [`Blob.GetBlobContent`](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/8222)), however I noticed that the developer experience wasn't ideal.
With this PR it would be very easy to declare a webcomponent, which will be loaded only if needed (I converted `model-viewer` and `pdf-object` to this technique).
Some cleanup in the neighbor webcomponents.
## Testing
1) Create a new repository or use an existing one.
2) Upload a `.pdf` or `.glb` file (such as https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/testdata/data/viewer/Unicode%E2%9D%A4%E2%99%BBTest.glb)
3) Open the Network inspector and view the file in the repository.
- After a short loading spinner, the PDF or 3D model should be rendered in a viewer
- the related JS should have been loaded (e.g. http://localhost:3000/assets/js/model-viewer.494bf0cd.js)
- visiting another page and check that this JS file isn't loaded
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8510
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Reviewed-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Reviewed-by: Beowulf <beowulf@beocode.eu>
Co-authored-by: oliverpool <git@olivier.pfad.fr>
Co-committed-by: oliverpool <git@olivier.pfad.fr>
Related: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/6977/files#diff-fd05eba523810d46c7763db938ad5839372a074a, https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/3949, https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7906
* use the new noJS dropdown for extra actions in org view (currently only includes report button)
* this required some refactoring of the area because the said dropdown was not built to be placed in an area where `font-size:36px` is forced onto everything
* this greatly improves consistently with user profiles which now use this type of dropdown
* I decided against making the opener button mimicrate an actual button because it looks ok as is and is consitent with menu in user profiles and because I don't think this is a good design language to make a kebab menu opener look this way
* add icon to the entry
* add atom entry
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8572
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Reviewed-by: Beowulf <beowulf@beocode.eu>
Co-authored-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
- Implementation of milestone 5. from **Task F. Moderation features: Reporting** (part of [amendment of the workplan](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/sustainability/src/branch/main/2022-12-01-nlnet/2025-02-07-extended-workplan.md#task-f-moderation-features-reporting) for NLnet 2022-12-035):
`5. Forgejo admins can see a list of reports`
There is a lot of room for improvements, but it was decided to start with a basic version so that feedback can be collected from real-life usages (based on which the UI might change a lot).
- Also covers milestone 2. from same **Task F. Moderation features: Reporting**:
`2. Reports from multiple users are combined in the database and don't create additional reports.`
But instead of combining the reports when stored, they are grouped when retrieved (it was concluded _that it might be preferable to take care of the deduplication while implementing the admin interface_; see https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7939#issuecomment-4841754 for more details).
---
Follow-up of !6977
### See also:
- forgejo/design#30
---
This adds a new _Moderation reports_ section (/admin/moderation/reports) within the _Site administration_ page, where administrators can see an overview with the submitted abuse reports that are still open (not yet handled in any way). When multiple reports exist for the same content (submitted by distinct users) only the first one will be shown in the list and a counter can be seen on the right side (indicating the number of open reports for the same content type and ID). Clicking on the counter or the icon from the right side will open the details page where a list with all the reports (when multiple) linked to the reported content is available, as well as any shadow copy saved for the current report(s).
The new section is available only when moderation in enabled ([moderation] ENABLED config is set as true within app.ini).
Discussions regarding the UI/UX started with https://codeberg.org/forgejo/design/issues/30#issuecomment-2908849
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7905
Reviewed-by: Otto <otto@codeberg.org>
Reviewed-by: jerger <jerger@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: floss4good <floss4good@disroot.org>
Co-committed-by: floss4good <floss4good@disroot.org>
This reverts commit 7380eac5a2.
Resolvesforgejo/forgejo#8612
It is possible for the action feed to reference deleted repositories the
`INNER JOIN` will make sure that these are filtered out. We cannot
filter these out after the fact, because the value of `count` will still
be incorrect.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8617
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Co-committed-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
This commit has the following:
* partial port of changes from [gitea#35053](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/35053) ([corresponding WCP](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8591))
* some changes were applied
* some strings we've fixed ourself before
* some strings we don't have
* a few fixes I wanted to propose but didn't want to dedicate a PR just to add a full stop to one string
Co-authored-by: DJ Phoenix <dikejoshua@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8593
Reviewed-by: Robert Wolff <mahlzahn@posteo.de>
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
As far as I can see and tell, the newest webkit version contains a regression that makes this specific test fail. The screenshots that are uploaded upon failure do not seem to suggest that this test should fail.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8611
Reviewed-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Kriese <michael.kriese@gmx.de>
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Co-committed-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
- Some SQL queries were not being run in the transaction of v32, which could lead to the migration failing or hanging indefinitely.
- Use `db.WithTx` to get a `context.Context` that will make sure to run SQL queries in the transaction.
- Using `db.DefaultContext` is fine to be used as parent context for starting the transaction, in all cases of starting the migration `x` and `db.DefaultContext` will point to the same engine.
- Resolvesforgejo/forgejo#8580
## Testing
1. Have a v11 Forgejo database with a maven package.
2. Run this migration.
<!--start release-notes-assistant-->
## Release notes
<!--URL:https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo-->
- Bug fixes
- [PR](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8609): <!--number 8609 --><!--line 0 --><!--description dXBncmFkZSBmYWlscyBvciBoYW5nIGF0IG1pZ3JhdGlvblszMl06IE1pZ3JhdGUgbWF2ZW4gcGFja2FnZSBuYW1lIGNvbmNhdGVuYXRpb24=-->upgrade fails or hang at migration[32]: Migrate maven package name concatenation<!--description-->
<!--end release-notes-assistant-->
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8609
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Reviewed-by: JSchlarb <jschlarb@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Co-committed-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
- This reverts behavior that was partially unintentionally introduced in forgejo/forgejo#8143, symbolic links were no longer followed (if they escaped the asset folder) for local assets.
- Having symbolic links for user-added files is, to my understanding, a ,common usecase for NixOS and would thus have symbolic links in the asset folders. Avoiding symbolic links is not easy.
- The previous code used `http.Dir`, we cannot use that as it's not of the same type. The equivalent is `os.DirFS`.
- Unit test to prevent this regression from happening again.
Reported-by: bloxx12 (Matrix).
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8596
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Co-committed-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Disable many unneeded variants in fomantic's config. Reduces the amount of CSS is generated.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8583
Reviewed-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Co-committed-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
In similar vein of forgejo/forgejo#7416
- Fomantic's tab module is responsible for showing the right content when a tab is clicked upon. Most notably the Write/Preview tabs on the comment editor.
- Remove it and replace the javascript with our own function that is able to provide everything Forgejo needs.
- Replace the CSS with our own bare minimum CSS.
- No functionality or visual is affected by this replacement.
- E2E test added.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8587
Reviewed-by: Otto <otto@codeberg.org>
Reviewed-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Co-committed-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
This PR contains the following updates:
| Package | Type | Update | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| [https://data.forgejo.org/actions/cascading-pr](https://code.forgejo.org/actions/cascading-pr) | action | patch | `v2.2.0` -> `v2.2.1` |
---
### Release Notes
<details>
<summary>actions/cascading-pr (https://data.forgejo.org/actions/cascading-pr)</summary>
### [`v2.2.1`](https://code.forgejo.org/actions/cascading-pr/compare/v2.2.0...v2.2.1)
[Compare Source](https://code.forgejo.org/actions/cascading-pr/compare/v2.2.0...v2.2.1)
</details>
---
### Configuration
📅 **Schedule**: Branch creation - Between 12:00 AM and 03:59 AM ( * 0-3 * * * ) (UTC), Automerge - Between 12:00 AM and 03:59 AM ( * 0-3 * * * ) (UTC).
🚦 **Automerge**: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.
♻ **Rebasing**: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.
🔕 **Ignore**: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.
---
- [ ] <!-- rebase-check -->If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box
---
This PR has been generated by [Renovate Bot](https://github.com/renovatebot/renovate).
<!--renovate-debug:eyJjcmVhdGVkSW5WZXIiOiI0MS4zMi4xIiwidXBkYXRlZEluVmVyIjoiNDEuMzIuMSIsInRhcmdldEJyYW5jaCI6ImZvcmdlam8iLCJsYWJlbHMiOlsiZGVwZW5kZW5jeS11cGdyYWRlIiwidGVzdC9ub3QtbmVlZGVkIl19-->
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8586
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Renovate Bot <forgejo-renovate-action@forgejo.org>
Co-committed-by: Renovate Bot <forgejo-renovate-action@forgejo.org>
Followup to https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/6201
Label height making entry height inconsistent isn't a concern because this change makes them 2px shorter. _And they are already inconsistent._
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8582
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Reviewed-by: Otto <otto@codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Follow-up of !6977
### Manual testing
- User **S** creates an organization **O** and posts a comment **C** (on a random issue);
- User **R** report as abuse the comment **C**, the organization **O** as well as the user **S**;
- User **S** changes the content of comment **C** and the description of organization **O** as well as the description of their own profile;
- Check (within DB) that shadow copies are being created (and linked to corresponding abuse reports) for comment **C**, organization **O** and user **S** and the content is the one from the moment when the reports were submitted (therefore before the updates made by **S**).
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8533
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: floss4good <floss4good@disroot.org>
Co-committed-by: floss4good <floss4good@disroot.org>
- `getElementById` requires a id to be passed and not a query selector, change it to `querySelector`.
- Regression of forgejo/forgejo#7408
- Resolvesforgejo/forgejo#8571
- Add E2E tests for adding manual tracked time and removing it.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8575
Reviewed-by: Otto <otto@codeberg.org>
Reviewed-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Co-committed-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
- Since v10 replies are generated on the fly to handle quoted reply (forgejo/forgejo#5677), this means that we have to do some work to construct markdown that is equivalent to the HTML of the comment.
- Images are slightly strange in the context of issues and pull requests, as Forgejo will render them in the context of the repository and as such links such as `/attachments` become `/user/repo/attachments`, the quoted reply did not take into account and would use `/user/repo/attachments` as link which means it gets transformed to `/user/repo//user/repo/attachments`.
- Instead of fixing this on the backend (and maybe break some existing links), teach the quoted reply about this context and remove it from the image source before generating the markdown.
Reported-by: mrwusel (via Matrix)
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8565
Reviewed-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Reviewed-by: Beowulf <beowulf@beocode.eu>
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Co-committed-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Hi all,
I believe that open source projects in general are under-appreciated. And no matter how big or small, every contribution matters, whether it's the implementation of a shiny new feature or just taking the time to make sure that a dependency is updated to its latest patch release.
I don't usually contribute to Forgejo, but we run an instance, and highly appreciate all of the work everyone involved is doing. As such, it kinda pains me to see the "Included for completeness but __not worth__ a release note" line (emphasis mine) in the release notes every time. More often than not, when clicking on one of those PRs, you'll see that people actually do put some thought into the changes hidden down there, there may even be more or less heated discussions about them, and even though these changes may not directly influence the user experience, they are an important part of running a project like this.
As such, I propose changing that line to "Included for completeness but not user facing (chores, etc.)" (courtesy of @earl-warren on Matrix). It's a really really small change, but I think it matters.
## Checklist
The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org).
### Tests
Not applicable since there are no Go or JavaScript changes.
- I added test coverage for Go changes...
- [ ] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests.
- [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server.
- I added test coverage for JavaScript changes...
- [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested.
- [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)).
### Documentation
Since this is only a change to the wording of the release notes, no user documentation is required for this.
- [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change.
- [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it.
### Release notes
This PR is certainly not worthy.
- [x] I do not want this change to show in the release notes.
- [ ] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request.
- [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8542
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Kumi <git@kumi.email>
Co-committed-by: Kumi <git@kumi.email>
- The `ACME_URL` setting is documented to default to Let's encrypt
production server if left empty, so do precisely that.
- Use a HTTP proxy to communicate with ACME if Forgejo is configured to
use that.
- Regression of forgejo/forgejo#7409 (previously certmagic took care of
setting these defaults).
- Resolvesforgejo/forgejo#8548
## Testing
1. Configure Forgejo's root URL to a public facing domain (that can pass a ACME challenge)
2. Configure Forgejo to use ACME by setting `[server].ENABLE_ACME = true` and `[server].ACME_ACCEPTTOS = true`.
3. Start Forgejo.
4. Observe that it's available via https.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8550
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Co-committed-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
